James Moore joins Steve Kornacki to discuss the breaking news out of
Texas that Gov. Rick Perry has been indicted for abuse of power.
Friday, August 15, 2014
Calling on our leaders to take a stance
The public calls on our nation’s leaders to take a strong stance against
the violence that occurred in Ferguson. Michael Eric Dyson, John
Fugelsang and James Peterson discuss.
Let's Be Clear About Michael Brown
Posted By Rude One
Here's a nice picture for your Thursday night:
This is the desperate attempt by Matt Drudge to show that Michael Brown,
who was shot down, unarmed, and, from multiple witness accounts, with
his hands up and moving away from a police car in Ferguson, Missouri,
was some kind of thug. How him flipping off the camera (in a jokey,
"I'm-just-scratching" way) accomplishes this only the terrier-fucking
Drudge would know. Drudge and other shit-eaters of the right just have
to gangsta Brown up in order to protect the power of the cop-soldiers who, until tonight, were acting like total, deranged, over-armed, roided-up cockholes with protesters, reporters, and people at home in Ferguson.
And to what end do Drudge and the cop's water carriers need to show this? To say that it was okay to gun the 18 year-old down?
Let's be fucking clear about Michael Brown:
It doesn't matter if he was the biggest drug dealer in the St. Louis metropolitan area.
It doesn't matter if he was the baddest gangsta in the Ferguson 'hood.
It doesn't matter if he was the biggest pimp in the state.
It doesn't matter if he had committed robberies or purse snatchings.
It doesn't matter how many gang signs he flashed with his hands.
It doesn't matter if he said, "Fuck tha police" every chance he got.
It doesn't matter if he flipped off cops or grabbed his junk while looking at them.
None of that justifies being gunned down by a police officer. None of it.
Of course, Michael Brown wasn't any of the above.
What does matter is what the cop did and what the cops have done and will do. You can bet that the officer who shot Brown didn't ask if he was a future college student.
He was just another nigger, indistinguishable from the niggers around him, and that was enough.
Here's a nice picture for your Thursday night:
And to what end do Drudge and the cop's water carriers need to show this? To say that it was okay to gun the 18 year-old down?
Let's be fucking clear about Michael Brown:
It doesn't matter if he was the biggest drug dealer in the St. Louis metropolitan area.
It doesn't matter if he was the baddest gangsta in the Ferguson 'hood.
It doesn't matter if he was the biggest pimp in the state.
It doesn't matter if he had committed robberies or purse snatchings.
It doesn't matter how many gang signs he flashed with his hands.
It doesn't matter if he said, "Fuck tha police" every chance he got.
It doesn't matter if he flipped off cops or grabbed his junk while looking at them.
None of that justifies being gunned down by a police officer. None of it.
Of course, Michael Brown wasn't any of the above.
What does matter is what the cop did and what the cops have done and will do. You can bet that the officer who shot Brown didn't ask if he was a future college student.
He was just another nigger, indistinguishable from the niggers around him, and that was enough.
Standing up to post office privatizers
Posted by Jim Hightower
"Boss," spelled backwards, is double-S-O-B, and that's how most of the employees of the US Postal Service feel about their top boss.
America's postal employees –from mail clerks to letter carriers – take great pride in moving millions of pieces of mail to us every day, whether we live in inner cities or way down at the bottom of the Grand Canyon, where mail is delivered by mule-riding letter carriers to a Native American tribe living there.
But USPS bossman, Postmaster General Pat Donahoe, definitely does not make postal workers proud, for he's been deliberately monkey-wrenching our mail system by slowing delivery, reducing staff and hours of service, closing neighborhood and historic post offices, shutting processing centers, trying to end Saturday delivery, badmouthing his own agency's performance, steadily corporatizing public functions, and transforming decent, union-scale jobs into the low-wage retail economy.
One portentous example of Donahoe's determination to bust the wages and undermine the performance of USPS is the sweetheart privatization scam he's set up with Staples. He's letting this big box retailer place official postal kiosks in its 1,500 stores – only they're not being staffed by highly trained, publically-accountable postal workers, but by Staple's own poverty-wage, high-turnover floor staff. In at least one case, Donahoe even cut the hours of service at post offices around a Staples store, then put up a sign directing postal customers to the Staples outlet.
Mark Dimondstein – the feisty president of the American Postal Workers Union – calls Donahoe "Wall Street's Trojan Horse, the privatizer from within." But, says Dimondstein, "We intend to stop him." His union has launched a Dump Donahoe campaign as well as a national boycott of Staples stores. For information and support, go to www.apwu.org
Listen to this Commentary
"Boss," spelled backwards, is double-S-O-B, and that's how most of the employees of the US Postal Service feel about their top boss.
America's postal employees –from mail clerks to letter carriers – take great pride in moving millions of pieces of mail to us every day, whether we live in inner cities or way down at the bottom of the Grand Canyon, where mail is delivered by mule-riding letter carriers to a Native American tribe living there.
But USPS bossman, Postmaster General Pat Donahoe, definitely does not make postal workers proud, for he's been deliberately monkey-wrenching our mail system by slowing delivery, reducing staff and hours of service, closing neighborhood and historic post offices, shutting processing centers, trying to end Saturday delivery, badmouthing his own agency's performance, steadily corporatizing public functions, and transforming decent, union-scale jobs into the low-wage retail economy.
One portentous example of Donahoe's determination to bust the wages and undermine the performance of USPS is the sweetheart privatization scam he's set up with Staples. He's letting this big box retailer place official postal kiosks in its 1,500 stores – only they're not being staffed by highly trained, publically-accountable postal workers, but by Staple's own poverty-wage, high-turnover floor staff. In at least one case, Donahoe even cut the hours of service at post offices around a Staples store, then put up a sign directing postal customers to the Staples outlet.
Mark Dimondstein – the feisty president of the American Postal Workers Union – calls Donahoe "Wall Street's Trojan Horse, the privatizer from within." But, says Dimondstein, "We intend to stop him." His union has launched a Dump Donahoe campaign as well as a national boycott of Staples stores. For information and support, go to www.apwu.org
Thursday, August 14, 2014
Anonymous’ Twitter account suspended in conjunction with Ferguson protests
Anonymous had threatened to reveal private information about a man they claimed to be Michael Brown's shooter
(Credit: Reuters/Nacho Doce)Hacking group Anonymous’ Twitter account (@TheAnonMessage) was suspended on Thursday. The group claimed to reveal the name of Michael Brown’s shooter via the social media website and threatened to publish his home address and photo if the Ferguson Police Department did not confirm the allegation.
According to NBC News, Chief Angel Jimenez of the St. Ann Police Department in Missouri said that the person accused by Anonymous is actually a dispatcher, not a police officer. “At no time has he ever been involved in a shooting in Ferguson or elsewhere,” said Jimenez.
While Twitter does not comment on individual accounts, when asked for comment, a representative pointed to the social media website’s rules, which states that Twitter does not permit users to ”publish or post other people’s private and confidential information” or “publish or post direct, specific threats of violence against others.” Anonymous had done both.
Anonymous has since switched to a backup account.
Twitter has suspended my main account. The powers that be will stop at nothing to silence us. #Anonymous #Ferguson
— TheAnonMessage2 (@TheAnonMessage2) August 14, 2014
Censoring us is an act of war. #Ferguson #TheAnonMessage
— TheAnonMessage2 (@TheAnonMessage2) August 14, 2014
Joanna Rothkopf is an assistant editor at Salon, focusing on sustainability. Follow @JoannaRothkopf or email jrothkopf@salon.com.
Chuck Todd to replace David Gregory on Meet the Press
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)
NBC will name Chuck Todd the new host of "Meet the Press" as early as Thursday afternoon, according to people with direct knowledge of the network's plans.
The sources confirmed widespread speculation that David Gregory, the moderator of the iconic Sunday morning public affairs program for the past six years, will be replaced by Todd.One of the sources said the transition will be swift - so swift that Gregory will not even host "Meet the Press" this weekend.
Gregory seemed to confirm that in a series of Twitter messages on Thursday afternoon, hours after this story was originally published.
"I leave NBC as I came - humbled and grateful," he wrote. "I love journalism and serving as moderator of MTP was the highest honor there is."
He added, "I have great respect for my colleagues at NBC News and wish them all well. To the viewers, I say thank you."
Todd, for whom the term "political junkie" seems invented, is currently the NBC News political director and the host of "The Daily Rundown," which airs at 9 a.m. ET on NBC's cable news channel MSNBC.
He will be the twelfth moderator in "Meet the Press" history. Born on radio in 1945 and reborn for television in 1947, "Meet the Press" is the longest-running show on TV.
Within NBC, it is a cherished brand, but it's also one that has fallen on hard times. With Todd in the anchor chair, NBC hopes to reinvigorate the program and its weekly ratings.
An NBC spokeswoman declined to comment.
Negotiations with Gregory and Todd were still underway Thursday.
An announcement about Todd's promotion would end an ugly period of public conjecture about Gregory's fate, made worse by the network's tepid statement of support for him earlier this summer.
When the New York Post's Page Six column said in July that Gregory could be replaced "soon after the November midterm elections," a network representative was quoted as saying, "We heard the same false rumors and suggest you take them with a grain of salt, as we did."
Tepid support, indeed.
Mike Allen of Politico reported earlier this week that Todd was the "likely successor" to Gregory and that the change was "expected to be announced in coming weeks."
That report may have accelerated the network's timetable. If not Thursday, the anchor change will be announced no later than Friday, the sources said.
The people spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment on the record.
On Thursday, Gregory was in New Hampshire, far from his Washington, D.C., office. NBC News president Deborah Turness was in New York, having canceled a long-planned trip to London, to oversee the transition.
Questions about Gregory's future on "Meet the Press" surfaced shortly after Turness took over the news division in the summer of 2013.
She has discussed any number of changes to the program, including, at one point, the possibility of a studio audience.
The best-known "Meet the Press" moderator is Tim Russert, who was appointed to the job in 1991 and died suddenly in June 2008 while preparing for an edition of the program. Under Russert, "Meet the Press" was solidly No. 1 in the ratings race among the broadcast networks.
After Russert's death, Tom Brokaw filled in until December 2008, when Gregory took over. The program now routinely ranks No. 3 behind "Face the Nation" on CBS and "This Week" on ABC.
XBox One is about to become movie pirates best friend
By GaryOPA
Microsoft continues to outpace Sony with another huge Xbox One update
Microsoft announced a huge new update to the Xbox One on Tuesday and it included a full-scale video player capable of supporting just about any kind of file you can think of including, MKV containers!
At Gamescom, Sony only teased that new 'user interface' is coming this fall with their PS4 updates, but Microsoft turned up the heat by announcing their Xbox One is getting a ton of more 'features' in series of updates thru-out the rest of year.
With the big one that they going to allow you to basically throw at it any media file you can think of, in their dream of making Xbox One the 'all-in-one' thingie attached your big screen living room TV, to compete against the battle of small little streaming xmbc-type boxes that people have now wired up to their connected household to watch all those 'pirated' movies, tv shows you always deny you have until you figure out that your new friends that you invited over to house are cool like you are, and not going slap you down with lawsuit for watching 'Expendables 3'.
Well, Microsoft had to do something as there is no good 'games' coming out until the next Holiday 2015 year, so you will need to do something with your new XB1 console this holiday season, even if it is just watching 'pirated' shit. -- Welcome to the Dark Side!Gamescom only just began, but Microsoft has already made a splash with a couple of huge Xbox One bundles, some exclusive game announcements and a software update that Xbox One (and PS4) owners have been waiting for since the consoles launched last fall. Major Nelson took to the Xbox Wire shortly before the media briefing kicked off to announce that a full-scale media player would finally be coming to the Xbox One.
The media player will be capable of playing just about any file you can throw at it, including .avi, .jpg, .gif, .mov, .mp3, .mpeg, .wma and .wmv.
Other additions to the console include a new "Friends" section, Snap Center and threaded messages with the full conversation history. Microsoft is also planning to release a digital TV tuner for the Xbox One in Europe, and those with the TV tuner will be the first to gain the ability to stream live TV on their SmartGlass devices. Xbox One owners will also be able to boot straight to TV and those with OneGuide will see a new mini guide at the bottom of the screen.
Those that have been invited to the Xbox One early access Preview program will get a chance to toy with all the new features later this month. The rest of us will have to wait until September for what looks to be one of the biggest updates yet for the Xbox One.
NEWS SOURCE #1: The Xbox One is about to become movie pirates’ best friend (via) BGR
NEWS SOURCE #2: Microsoft continues to outpace Sony with another huge Xbox One update (via) BGR
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
We're Lucky There Aren't More Riots
Posted By Rude One
That photo is of police patrolling the streets of Ferguson, Missouri, in the wake of a night of riots and looting in the wake of the shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown by a white cop. In that suburb of St. Louis, the population is 67% black, but there are only 3 black cops on the 53 person police force, with 2 other non-whites). What's fascinating about the picture is that the front line of five officers (two from other areas, no doubt) is all black while behind them are roughly a dozen and a half white cops and not a single other non-white one. (Side note: Has anyone written about GOP opposition to Obama as a symbolic castration and its effect on blacks in this country?)
And that's the problem, isn't it? It's that no matter where black men turn, there are always white men with guns right behind them, whether it's asshole cops or asshole gun owners. No matter if there's a black man in the White House; there's always a power structure founded on and fostered by whiteness that exists with little challenge.
What is there to say about the riots, about the looting, about the burning of businesses in Ferguson?
Yeah, it's wrong to steal shit and fuck up buildings. It's more wrong to gun down a kid who, according to many witnesses, had his hands up and, according to official reports, was 35 feet away from the police car. If you believe the law is no longer on your side - indeed, if you believe its enforcers are using it to harm you - why the fuck wouldn't you riot? Tea Party assholes march around with their guns out right after mass shootings, and no one shoots them down. Maybe it's time for some Black Panther action.
Frankly, it's a shock that there aren't more riots, in Staten Island and in Dayton, in just the last few weeks of cops killing black men. As Brittney Cooper writes in Salon, "To be black in this country is to be subject to routine forms of miscalculated risk each and every day. Black people have every right to be angry as hell about being mistaken for predators when really we are prey."
The median income in Ferguson is $37,000, ten grand lower than the state average. The state has refused to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. 92% of people arrested in Ferguson are black, taken in by, as mentioned before, the over 90% white police force. Of course, poverty combined with racism combined with the endless stream of whites killing unarmed blacks for no reason is going to add up to an explosion.
We as a nation have fucked over black Americans in so many ways. We've isolated many in neighborhoods with shitty housing, shitty schools, shitty businesses, and shitty health care. We've demonized affirmative action. We've gutted welfare programs, work programs, and other poverty programs. We've given prisons over to private corporations that demand to be filled with any kind of petty criminal under minimum sentencing laws and the worthless drug war.
So we've filled the shitty streets with cops who have been given the right to harass blacks into hatred of the authority they should be able to turn to to stop the crimes that matter. We have made it so that, even if you're not from one of these shitty neighborhoods, you are forever framed by them, forever framed as a thug or a bitch, forever suspect.
Then we've said, "You're an American. You have opportunity. You can pull yourself up by your bootstraps and live the American dream." Goddamnit, the Rude Pundit wants to fuck shit up just writing that. He can't imagine living it.
So, sure, it's a shame that others now suffer economically (mostly) in the wake of the Michael Brown killing. But when when the plants in the ground finally grow, you don't blame the leaves. You blame the people who put the seeds in the dirt and watered them, decade after decade.
That photo is of police patrolling the streets of Ferguson, Missouri, in the wake of a night of riots and looting in the wake of the shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown by a white cop. In that suburb of St. Louis, the population is 67% black, but there are only 3 black cops on the 53 person police force, with 2 other non-whites). What's fascinating about the picture is that the front line of five officers (two from other areas, no doubt) is all black while behind them are roughly a dozen and a half white cops and not a single other non-white one. (Side note: Has anyone written about GOP opposition to Obama as a symbolic castration and its effect on blacks in this country?)
And that's the problem, isn't it? It's that no matter where black men turn, there are always white men with guns right behind them, whether it's asshole cops or asshole gun owners. No matter if there's a black man in the White House; there's always a power structure founded on and fostered by whiteness that exists with little challenge.
What is there to say about the riots, about the looting, about the burning of businesses in Ferguson?
Yeah, it's wrong to steal shit and fuck up buildings. It's more wrong to gun down a kid who, according to many witnesses, had his hands up and, according to official reports, was 35 feet away from the police car. If you believe the law is no longer on your side - indeed, if you believe its enforcers are using it to harm you - why the fuck wouldn't you riot? Tea Party assholes march around with their guns out right after mass shootings, and no one shoots them down. Maybe it's time for some Black Panther action.
Frankly, it's a shock that there aren't more riots, in Staten Island and in Dayton, in just the last few weeks of cops killing black men. As Brittney Cooper writes in Salon, "To be black in this country is to be subject to routine forms of miscalculated risk each and every day. Black people have every right to be angry as hell about being mistaken for predators when really we are prey."
The median income in Ferguson is $37,000, ten grand lower than the state average. The state has refused to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. 92% of people arrested in Ferguson are black, taken in by, as mentioned before, the over 90% white police force. Of course, poverty combined with racism combined with the endless stream of whites killing unarmed blacks for no reason is going to add up to an explosion.
We as a nation have fucked over black Americans in so many ways. We've isolated many in neighborhoods with shitty housing, shitty schools, shitty businesses, and shitty health care. We've demonized affirmative action. We've gutted welfare programs, work programs, and other poverty programs. We've given prisons over to private corporations that demand to be filled with any kind of petty criminal under minimum sentencing laws and the worthless drug war.
So we've filled the shitty streets with cops who have been given the right to harass blacks into hatred of the authority they should be able to turn to to stop the crimes that matter. We have made it so that, even if you're not from one of these shitty neighborhoods, you are forever framed by them, forever framed as a thug or a bitch, forever suspect.
Then we've said, "You're an American. You have opportunity. You can pull yourself up by your bootstraps and live the American dream." Goddamnit, the Rude Pundit wants to fuck shit up just writing that. He can't imagine living it.
So, sure, it's a shame that others now suffer economically (mostly) in the wake of the Michael Brown killing. But when when the plants in the ground finally grow, you don't blame the leaves. You blame the people who put the seeds in the dirt and watered them, decade after decade.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
As Washington DC Remains Gridlocked, Cities Are Shifting Toward Progressive Politics
After Bill Clinton was elected president in 1992 one of his key aides, Rahm Emanuel, sat in the campaign’s favorite restaurant in Little Rock, Arkansas, venting his frustration at those who had tried to stand in their way. He would call out a name, ram his steak knife into the table and, like Bluto in Animal House, shout “Dead!” Then he would pull the knife out and call another name and stab the table again.
Heaven only knows what damage he does to the furniture when he mentions Karen Lewis’s name.
Emanuel, who was Barack Obama’s chief of staff, is now mayor of Chicago. Lewis is the head of the Chicago Teachers Union who got the better of him after leading the teachers in a strike two years ago.
The two genuinely despise each other. When Lewis took on Emanuel over lengthening the school day, he told her: “Fuck you, Lewis!”; during the strike Lewis branded him a “liar and a bully”.
Now Lewis is seriously considering running against Emanuel for the mayoralty next year. People are wearing buttons urging her candidacy and setting up Facebook pages to support her. When she showed up at a civil rights conference two months ago the crowd cheered “Run, Karen, run!”
She could win.
A Chicago Sun Times poll last month gave Lewis a nine-point lead with 18% undecided. Other polls have Emanuel in front by a similar margin. But between them a general picture emerges. The situation is volatile; Emanuel is vulnerable and Lewis is viable.
Beyond the idiosyncrasies of the case, the possibility that America’s third largest city might elect a union leader over an establishment Democrat marks a broader national shift towards progressive city politics.
Across the country, from New York to Seattle and Boston to Pittsburgh, municipal authorities are swinging left. As Harold Meyerson argued in the American Prospect: “The mayoral and council class of 2013 is one of the most progressive cohorts of elected officials in recent American history... They are, in short, enacting at the municipal level many of the major policy changes that progressives have found themselves unable to enact at the federal and state levels. They also may be charting a new course for American liberalism.”
The organizational and electoral bases of these campaigns are virtually the same as those that propelled Obama to victory – trade unions, minorities, young people (particularly young women) and liberals. And they are promising what Obama has been unwilling or unable to deliver. They are trying to raise the minimum wage, introduce green technology, create affordable housing, levy money from the wealthy to fund universal childcare and rein in their police departments from racist excess.
These are bold plans and, for the most part, they are acting on them. Bill de Blasio, the mayor of New York, has described the city as a “laboratory” for New Deal-style reforms. In reality these initiatives are more like local triage against the wounds of over a generation of stagnant wages, neoliberal reform and the class and racial polarisation that comes with them – all of which were further aggravated by the most recent economic crisis. It looks like the New Deal only because so many Americans have been getting such a bad deal for so long. Local, populist and redistributive, they owe more to the Occupy movement of 2011 of which they are the most logical, likely corollary. Their agendas, of course, are far less ambitious. But they share a trajectory.
As such, the ramifications go beyond the local. Public imagination when it comes to political geography is skewed. People think in terms of red and blue states, but the real distinction is between town and country. With just a handful of exceptions, every city of more than 500,000 inhabitants votes Democrat; in all of the 10 largest cities in America white people are a minority. More than two-thirds of Obama’s lead against Mitt Romney in 2012 came from the three largest US cities – New York, LA and Chicago, and their surrounding areas. It’s not difficult to see why. People come to cities to escape isolation and find opportunity. So cities become home to a disproportionately large number of gay and lesbian people, immigrants and religious minorities. To function they demand social tolerance and public investment for everything from transport to parks.
Cities are where the overwhelming majority of the Democratic base lives. The increasingly pronounced inequalities of race and class, the impact of neo-liberal school reforms and general disinvestment in social capital have hit all but the very wealthy hard. Anyone seeking the presidential nomination would be a fool to ignore this.
Lewis, like De Blasio before her, is touting a “tale of two cities” theme, calling not just for greater equality but a more liveable city. She’s talking like a candidate even if she has yet to confirm her candidacy. There is much to weigh.
Chicagoans have not taken to Emanuel. His notoriously abrasive manner and high-handed, confrontational approach grates. His predecessor, Richard Daley, was embraced as an authentic Chicagoan with no ambitions beyond the city, even if he came across in public as a monosyllabic dolt. Emanuel has acted – wilfully it seems – like a polarising product of Washington, slick and insensitive.
Lewis has made her fair share of enemies too. But she is a populist who as a former standup comedian has a better feel for her audience. She also cuts an intriguing figure. She’s an African-American woman who recently converted to Judaism. She studied music in college, has a master’s degree in film, and taught chemistry in high school.
Lewis has intensity. Those who follow her – and there are many – will go all out and all the way. But Rahm’s speed dial has bling. When he ran four years ago, he would hang up on donors who’d sent him $5,000, saying he was embarrassed to accept such checks from people who could easily afford $25,000.
Lewis will give Rahm a run for his money. She’ll have to: Emanuel has an awful lot of money. And while progressive voters do get the final word, it won’t be before corporate sponsors have had their say.
Monday, August 11, 2014
Sydney man in Syria posts picture of son holding severed head
‘That’s My Boy’: Islamic State Fighter Tweets Photo of His Son Holding a Severed Head
Editor’s Note:
“That’s my boy.”
This story contains a graphic image and descriptions.
Those are said to be the proud words of a convicted terrorist who tweeted out a photo of his young son holding up the severed head of a slain Syrian soldier.
The photo, published in The Australian newspaper, reportedly shows the son of Khaled Sharrouf, a Sydney man who fled to Syria last year and joined up with Islamic State militants. The boy, wearing a blue shirt and a blue watch, uses both hands to grab fistfuls of hair to hold the head up for the camera.
Image source: The Australian
According to the newspaper, Sharrouf posted other photos as well, including one posing with his sons, everyone decked out in fatigues and holding guns in front of the IS flag, and another of himself with the same severed head.
“There are more photographs in newspapers in Australia today of the kind of hideous atrocities that this group is capable of,” Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott told Australian radio. “[The] Islamic State — as they’re now calling themselves — it’s not just a terrorist group, it’s a terrorist army and they’re seeking not just a terrorist enclave but effectively a terrorist state, a terrorist nation.”
Image source: The Australian
The Islamic State, previously known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, has seized significant territory in the region and proclaimed a caliphate. Its gains across Iraq prompted the United States last week to begin a series of airstrikes to impede its advance.
“ISIL is a threat to the civilized world, certainly to the United States, to our interests, as it is to Europe, it is to Australia,” U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said in Sydney. “I think reflected on the local newspaper I saw this morning, with the picture on the front page, it’s pretty graphic evidence of the real threat that ISIL represents.”
Iraqi troops and tanks deployed in Baghdad
By Mohammed Tawfeeq and Catherine E. Shoichet, CNN
(CNN) - Iraqi troops, security forces and tanks surged into Baghdad on Sunday as political turmoil deepened over who should lead the country.
(CNN) - Iraqi troops, security forces and tanks surged into Baghdad on Sunday as political turmoil deepened over who should lead the country.
Military tanks were
deployed to several neighborhoods in central Baghdad, two Iraqi police
officials told CNN. The officials said there are also significantly more
troops in Baghdad's Green Zone, the secure area where many government
buildings, the military headquarters and the U.S. Embassy are located.
The stepped-up troop presence comes as Iraqi forces battle Islamist militants
in northern Iraq, and just after Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki accused
Fuad Masum, Iraq's newly elected President, of violating the country's
constitution by extending the deadline for Iraq's biggest political
coalitions to nominate a candidate for prime minister.
The precise reason for
the growing number of troops in the Iraqi capital was unclear. But CNN
military analyst retired Lt. Col. Rick Francona described it as an
"ominous" development that signals the Iraqi Prime Minister doesn't want
to hand over power.
"You've got Nuri
al-Maliki refusing to step down. Now he's mobilized not just security
troops loyal to him, but now he's mobilized army units to put tanks in
the streets. Some of the bridges have been closed," Francona said. "It
looks like he's trying to lock down the city in some sort of
confrontation with the President, so this does not portend well."
Retired Marine Gen. James
Williams said the stepped up security could also be a response to
advances by militants from ISIS, the Sunni Muslim extremist group that
has now declared itself the Islamic State.
"It could be a show of
force. If you're talking about protecting government buildings, there
may be a sense that ISIS forces may be closer than everybody thinks at
this point, and so depending on what the undercurrent in Baghdad right
now, that could be a great sign for concern," Williams said. "But it may
also be a concern that there's a coup afoot."
CNN's Michael Holmes said al-Maliki could be digging in his heels for a political battle.
"It's not in his DNA to
go without a fight. This is a man who's really feeling besieged at the
moment. He's cornered on all sides, if you like," Holmes said. "He's got
ISIS on his doorstep, in a military sense. He even had the Grand
Ayatollah the other day saying politicians should not cling to their
posts. But this is a guy who seizes onto power. He holds it."
In a televised speech
Sunday, al-Maliki said he would file a complaint against Masum for
allegedly violating Iraq's constitution.
Lawmakers elected Masum,
a veteran Kurdish politician who's been a member of the Iraqi
parliament since 2005, to the presidency last month.
Choosing a prime
minister is a key next step for Iraq's leaders. Critics of al-Maliki
have called for him to pull his name out of the running, but he's repeatedly refused.
Al-Maliki and his
Shiite-dominated government have been under enormous international
pressure to be more inclusive of the country's minority Sunni
population, who say they have been marginalized and cut out of the
political process.
Obama administration
officials have talked repeatedly about how their priority is a political
settlement that creates a more inclusive government in Iraq. A deadline
to agree on a new prime minister had been set for last week and was
extended on Sunday.
In a statement Sunday,
State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said the United States is
closely monitoring the situation and supports Iraq's President.
"The United States fully
supports President Fuad Masum in his role as guarantor of the Iraqi
constitution," she said. "We reaffirm our support for a process to
select a Prime Minister who can represent the aspirations of the Iraqi
people by building a national consensus and governing in an inclusive
manner. We reject any effort to achieve outcomes through coercion or
manipulation of the constitutional or judicial process."
U.S. officials who put their faith in al-Maliki for years may have misjudged him, Francona said.
"Most people thought
that there would be this peaceful transition to the new government. He
served for two terms," Francona said. "Now he's refusing to step down.
... This looks very bad, like he's going to refuse to go."
CNN's Chelsea J. Carter, Jim Sciutto, Elise Labott and Kevin Bohn contributed to this report.
Anonymous To Ferguson Police: Expect Us
By karoli
Anonymous published a list of demands in response to the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.
Anonymous has stepped into the Ferguson, Missouri police shooting of a young unarmed black man and they have done so with firm resolve.
In their video above, they demand that elected representatives for that area introduce legislation defining clear standards of conduct for police in situations like the one that resulted in the shooting of Mike Brown Saturday.
They further state that if this demand isn't met, they will hack into police department databases and publish confidential data they obtain.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with Anonymous' operating tactics, what they're asking for is not outrageous. There is a point where a line in the sand is needed, and where everyone should stop pretending the police are always right and the people are always wrong. That right/wrong view seems to be the one that prevails when black or brown people are the ones protesting in the street.
That kid lay in the street for hours while they beefed up their militarized presence in Ferguson, as if to invite violence. I'm not sure I'm buying the "official account" of how Brown came to be shot eight times, either. If he allegedly attacked the cop sitting in the car, how did he come to fall 35 feet away while the cop never got out of the car?
As a writer, it's difficult to balance a desire not to slam police, who have a difficult and demanding job against sympathy for an unarmed kid dead in the street. In some cases, criticism just lives in the situation. This is one of those times.
Ferguson's elected officials should take Anonymous' demands seriously.
(As a side note, Twitter killed the #OpFerguson hashtag and suspended the @OpFerguson account. I'm sure glad they believe in free speech. I guess for them that's only for conservatives.)
Anonymous published a list of demands in response to the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.
Anonymous has stepped into the Ferguson, Missouri police shooting of a young unarmed black man and they have done so with firm resolve.
In their video above, they demand that elected representatives for that area introduce legislation defining clear standards of conduct for police in situations like the one that resulted in the shooting of Mike Brown Saturday.
They further state that if this demand isn't met, they will hack into police department databases and publish confidential data they obtain.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with Anonymous' operating tactics, what they're asking for is not outrageous. There is a point where a line in the sand is needed, and where everyone should stop pretending the police are always right and the people are always wrong. That right/wrong view seems to be the one that prevails when black or brown people are the ones protesting in the street.
That kid lay in the street for hours while they beefed up their militarized presence in Ferguson, as if to invite violence. I'm not sure I'm buying the "official account" of how Brown came to be shot eight times, either. If he allegedly attacked the cop sitting in the car, how did he come to fall 35 feet away while the cop never got out of the car?
As a writer, it's difficult to balance a desire not to slam police, who have a difficult and demanding job against sympathy for an unarmed kid dead in the street. In some cases, criticism just lives in the situation. This is one of those times.
Ferguson's elected officials should take Anonymous' demands seriously.
(As a side note, Twitter killed the #OpFerguson hashtag and suspended the @OpFerguson account. I'm sure glad they believe in free speech. I guess for them that's only for conservatives.)
Saturday, August 9, 2014
Who is ISIS?
Who is the extreme group known as the “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria?” Rev. Al Sharpton discusses with Evan Kohlmann.
Philly Mom Who Carried Licensed Gun Into NJ Faces 11 Years in Prison
By Bill Anderson
Chasing New Jersey
first brought you the story of Shaneen Allen, the single mother from
Philadelphia who didn't know it was illegal to bring the gun she was
legally licensed to carry in Philly into New Jersey. When she got pulled
over for a minor traffic offense she told the police about the gun and
was arrested facing a mandatory three-year sentence.
My9 New Jersey
After hearing about the case, most people thought there's no way she would do time for an honest mistake. Well, yesterday she was in court and she can now face a maximum sentence of 11.5 years in prison. Ten years for possession of a weapon and another 18 months for possession of the bullets.
Allen's attorney Evan Nappen discussed how a person with no prior offenses could end up spending a decade behind bars for being honest.
“New Jersey's gun law is as unforgiving as a prosecutor or judge wants to make it. Either of those two, the judge or the prosecutor could have taken steps to relieve Shaneen from this situation, but it didn't happen,” he said.
Nappen said that not only did the judge not dismiss the case, but the prosecutor will not allow her into a pretrial intervention to avoid jail time.
Now, Allen is left with no choice but to go forward to trial. She hopes that a jury will hear her case and won't think that an honest mistake should cost her 11.5 years of her life.
“Shaneen Allen has no criminal background at all. She has no firearm disqualifiers at all. Listen if she did, she wouldn't have gotten a license to carry from the city of Philadelphia,” Nappen explained.
The best offer that the prosecutor gave was a five-year plea bargain with no option for parole for 3.5 years.
My9 New Jersey
After hearing about the case, most people thought there's no way she would do time for an honest mistake. Well, yesterday she was in court and she can now face a maximum sentence of 11.5 years in prison. Ten years for possession of a weapon and another 18 months for possession of the bullets.
Allen's attorney Evan Nappen discussed how a person with no prior offenses could end up spending a decade behind bars for being honest.
“New Jersey's gun law is as unforgiving as a prosecutor or judge wants to make it. Either of those two, the judge or the prosecutor could have taken steps to relieve Shaneen from this situation, but it didn't happen,” he said.
Nappen said that not only did the judge not dismiss the case, but the prosecutor will not allow her into a pretrial intervention to avoid jail time.
Now, Allen is left with no choice but to go forward to trial. She hopes that a jury will hear her case and won't think that an honest mistake should cost her 11.5 years of her life.
“Shaneen Allen has no criminal background at all. She has no firearm disqualifiers at all. Listen if she did, she wouldn't have gotten a license to carry from the city of Philadelphia,” Nappen explained.
The best offer that the prosecutor gave was a five-year plea bargain with no option for parole for 3.5 years.
Friday, August 8, 2014
Political blogger outs herself as paid troll for big telecom
By Arturo Garcia
![Tech 'consultant' Kendall High [youtube]](http://www.rawstory.com/rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Tech-consultant-Kendall-High-youtube.jpg)
The editor of a politics website geared toward
communities of color revealed that she is paid to be a “consultant” for a
lobbyist group that has represented both the tobacco industry and the
cable industry, Vice magazine reported.
Politic365.com co-founder and editor-in-chief Kristal High revealed her ties to the lobbying firm the DCI Group during an interview on Wednesday with talk show host David Pakman in which Pakman mentioned that both High and a past guest, Everett Ehrlich, were pitched to his program as guests by DCI.
“Are individuals like you and Everett Ehrlich, are you paid by DCI?” Pakman asked High.
“I think you have to really consider what it is you’re suggesting, you’re asking there,” High said. “If people are working on different issues, there could be, say, a consulting arrangement that’s separate and apart from whatever it is people are advocating for.”
“In other words, DCI may be paying you as a consultant,” Pakman responded, pushing back. “But they’re not paying you for the media appearances or being a spokesperson for the point of view that their clients espouse.”
“Right,” High answered.
According to Vice, High and colleagues at her website have posted in the magazine’s comments section defending the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) otherwise heavily-criticized plans regarding net neutrality.
In one instance, High reportedly commented that Vice was wrong to focus on the “lobbying dollars” being used to influence the public discussion regarding the issue, a sentiment she revisited on Pakman’s show.
“The argument has also kind of devolved, in my opinion, to this nitpicky sort of, ‘Who’s in your pocket? How are you making money?’” she told Pakman. “I think that misses the point of the actual issue here.”
However, High did not reveal whether she was being paid by the DCI Group when she made her comments at Vice, or when she wrote columns for the Huffington Post, including a December 2013 op-ed in which she criticized net neutrality advocates by saying their arguments “fall short of reality.”
“The Internet is a two-sided market, and neutrality is about the supply and content side, not the demand and user side. Wealthy individuals already have access to better and faster Internet because they live in high-income neighborhoods and are prepared to pay more,” she wrote. “In reality, the neutrality debate is more about whether Netflix may have to pay for premium access for better services, not about what consumers will pay.”
According to Vice, High’s website is affiliated with an organization called the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council. A June 2013 report by the Center for Public Integrity found that the council had received $440,000 since 2010 from groups tied to media companies. Politic365 also reportedly received a $10,000 donation two years ago from another trade group, CTIA.
Last year, a CTIA affiliate, MyWireless.org, released a video in which High appeared saying African-Americans “are overwhelmingly satisfied with their wireless phone service.”
Watch Pakman’s interview with High, as posted online on Tuesday, below.
Politic365.com co-founder and editor-in-chief Kristal High revealed her ties to the lobbying firm the DCI Group during an interview on Wednesday with talk show host David Pakman in which Pakman mentioned that both High and a past guest, Everett Ehrlich, were pitched to his program as guests by DCI.
“Are individuals like you and Everett Ehrlich, are you paid by DCI?” Pakman asked High.
“I think you have to really consider what it is you’re suggesting, you’re asking there,” High said. “If people are working on different issues, there could be, say, a consulting arrangement that’s separate and apart from whatever it is people are advocating for.”
“In other words, DCI may be paying you as a consultant,” Pakman responded, pushing back. “But they’re not paying you for the media appearances or being a spokesperson for the point of view that their clients espouse.”
“Right,” High answered.
According to Vice, High and colleagues at her website have posted in the magazine’s comments section defending the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) otherwise heavily-criticized plans regarding net neutrality.
In one instance, High reportedly commented that Vice was wrong to focus on the “lobbying dollars” being used to influence the public discussion regarding the issue, a sentiment she revisited on Pakman’s show.
“The argument has also kind of devolved, in my opinion, to this nitpicky sort of, ‘Who’s in your pocket? How are you making money?’” she told Pakman. “I think that misses the point of the actual issue here.”
However, High did not reveal whether she was being paid by the DCI Group when she made her comments at Vice, or when she wrote columns for the Huffington Post, including a December 2013 op-ed in which she criticized net neutrality advocates by saying their arguments “fall short of reality.”
“The Internet is a two-sided market, and neutrality is about the supply and content side, not the demand and user side. Wealthy individuals already have access to better and faster Internet because they live in high-income neighborhoods and are prepared to pay more,” she wrote. “In reality, the neutrality debate is more about whether Netflix may have to pay for premium access for better services, not about what consumers will pay.”
According to Vice, High’s website is affiliated with an organization called the Minority Media and Telecommunications Council. A June 2013 report by the Center for Public Integrity found that the council had received $440,000 since 2010 from groups tied to media companies. Politic365 also reportedly received a $10,000 donation two years ago from another trade group, CTIA.
Last year, a CTIA affiliate, MyWireless.org, released a video in which High appeared saying African-Americans “are overwhelmingly satisfied with their wireless phone service.”
Watch Pakman’s interview with High, as posted online on Tuesday, below.
Arturo Garcia
Arturo R. GarcÃa is
the managing editor at Racialicious.com. He is based in San Diego,
California and has written for both print and broadcast media, including
contributions to GlobalComment.com, The Root and Comment Is Free.
Follow him on Twitter at @ABoyNamedArt
Obama Authorizes Air Strikes, Aid Mission in Iraq
President Obama
said tonight he has authorized "targeted" air strikes if necessary to
protect American interests in Iraq from insurgent forces that are taking
over the country's northern cities.
If the terrorist group ISIS reaches Erbil, the president said he will
call in U.S. air strikes. The U.S. has an embassy and other staffers in
the city. Air strikes have also been authorized to protect families
fleeing ISIS in the Sinjar Mountains.
"These innocent families are faced with a choice: descend and be slaughtered or stay and slowly die of hunger," he said.
Obama said U.S. combat troops will not return.
"As commander in chief, I will not allow the United States to be drawn into fighting another war in Iraq," Obama said.
The announcements marked the deepest American engagement in Iraq since
U.S. troops withdrew in late 2011 after nearly a decade of war.
"Today, America is coming to help," Obama said. "The U.S. cannot turn a blind eye."
An air drop of food, water and medicine made at the request of the Iraqi
government has been completed, the president said in the statement from
the White House.
U.S. aircraft, escorted by fighter jets, dropped 5,300 gallons of fresh
drinking water and 8,000 meals ready to eat. The aircraft were over the
drop area for less than 15 minutes flying at a low altitude, the U.S.
Central Command said in a statement.
The emergency effort is being deployed to help a group of 40,000
Yazidis, a group of ethnic Kurds, who fled villages in northern Iraq
under threat from ISIS.
The Yazidis fled to the Sinjar Mountains, in a remote part of northern
Iraq near the border of Syria, where they are stuck without food or
water while ISIS forces are gathered at the base of the mountains.
ISIS has overtaken much of the northern part of Iraq, including the city
of Mosul, over the past two months. They are simultaneously waging
campaigns for territory in Syria and Lebanon in their quest to create a
unified Islamic state encompassing territory from all three countries.
The Iraqi government has had little success battling ISIS.
In a statement, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said a solution to the
threat posed by ISIS "will require further reconciliation among Iraqi
communities and strengthened Iraqi security forces."
"Department of Defense personnel in Iraq therefore continue to assess
opportunities to help train, advise, and assist Iraqi forces, and will
provide increased support once Iraq has formed a new government," he
said.
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
Plums, peaches recall expanded by California company
Wawona Packing Company of California is expanding their product recall due to possible listeria contamination.
MONDAY, Aug. 4, 2014 (HealthDay News) - A recall of fresh, whole peaches, nectarines, plums and pluots is being expanded by Wawona Packing Company of California due to possible listeria contamination.
Listeria monocytogenes can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, seniors, and people with weak immune systems. Listeria infection can also cause miscarriages and stillbirths in pregnant women.
On July 19, the Wawona Packing Company issued a recall for specific fresh, whole peaches, nectarines, plums and pluots packed between June 1 and July 12, 2014. The expanded recall covers all such fruits packed between June 1 and July 17.
The recalled products include the brands Sweet 2 Eat, Sweet 2 Eat Organic, and Mrs. Smittcamp's, and were also packed under private labels. Anyone with the recalled products should throw them away.
For more information, consumers can go to Wawona's website or call the company at 1-888-232-9912, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. EST or Saturday and Sunday between Sun 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. EST.
MONDAY, Aug. 4, 2014 (HealthDay News) - A recall of fresh, whole peaches, nectarines, plums and pluots is being expanded by Wawona Packing Company of California due to possible listeria contamination.
Listeria monocytogenes can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, seniors, and people with weak immune systems. Listeria infection can also cause miscarriages and stillbirths in pregnant women.
On July 19, the Wawona Packing Company issued a recall for specific fresh, whole peaches, nectarines, plums and pluots packed between June 1 and July 12, 2014. The expanded recall covers all such fruits packed between June 1 and July 17.
The recalled products include the brands Sweet 2 Eat, Sweet 2 Eat Organic, and Mrs. Smittcamp's, and were also packed under private labels. Anyone with the recalled products should throw them away.
For more information, consumers can go to Wawona's website or call the company at 1-888-232-9912, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. EST or Saturday and Sunday between Sun 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. EST.
Monday, August 4, 2014
A Walmart in North Dakota: Or AEI thinks you're dumber than a bag of hammers
By Dante Atkins for Daily Kos
In his first point, Professor Perry notes the first and most obvious thing about about the store in Williston: the comparison between the wages at the store in Williston with Walmart's average wages nationwide indicate that, yes, even Walmart has to respond to the market forces prevalent in a particular community in order to get its stores staffed.
Yes, Walmart won't be able to staff its stores if it attempted to pay minimum wage in Williston—but that doesn't mean that market forces require Walmart to pay lower wages in other places. Perry's apparent confusion on this issue is illustrative of a significant difference between upward pressure and downward pressure on wages: upward pressure on wages sets a higher floor for businesses to be able to get labor at all.
Downward pressure, on the other hand, allows businesses to use wage levels as a determiner of company values and strategy. A Costco and a Walmart in the same general vicinity are subject to the same wage pressures, but Costco chooses to pay a higher wage to engender higher employee loyalty and morale, along with its corresponding effects on customer satisfaction.
Walmart, on the other hand, chooses to exploit its labor by seeking it out at the lowest possible price, and expecting government to pick up the remaining tab through social services. In short, Walmart could choose to pay higher wages: after all, if it weren't profitable to keep the store in Williston open despite the comparatively high labor costs, Walmart would simply close it down.
But Dr. Perry isn't just using the example of this one store to mistakenly defend Walmart's business practices. Instead, he and AEI are using it to attack the very concept of a minimum wage:
There's a Walmart out there that pays well. But it's not yours.
It's hard to think of two things that the right wing loves more than
Walmart and oil drilling. So it comes as no surprise that the American
Enterprise Institute, one of the conservative movement's most
influential and aggressive pro-business economic think tanks, would be
overjoyed at the opportunity to promote both in one fell swoop.
Last
month, Professor Mark J. Perry, a scholar at AEI, found just that
opportunity in the form of a picture
documenting the starting wages at the Walmart in Williston, North
Dakota. The wages in question range between $17.20 and $19.90 an hour—far higher than Walmart's average hourly rate, and yet still a few dollars short of the wage of the average employee at Costco.
Now, to set the stage here, North Dakota is in the middle of an oil boom. The increased price of crude has combined with the development of new extraction techniques to result in a massive expansion of oil production in the Bakken shale. This has led to North Dakota having the lowest employment of any state in the country, and the Williston area is right at the boom's epicenter.
Now, in what follows, we're going to ignore the fact that the continued extraction of oil from the Bakken shale is actively contributing to the warming of our planet and the concomitant impending destruction of society as we know it, and choose instead to focus on the specific economic arguments.
See, Dr. Perry is using the example of this one Walmart situated in the middle of perhaps the strongest economy in the state to argue for Walmart and against the minimum wage. Either he's dumber than a bag of hammers, or he thinks his readers are, and it's hard to tell which.
Now, to set the stage here, North Dakota is in the middle of an oil boom. The increased price of crude has combined with the development of new extraction techniques to result in a massive expansion of oil production in the Bakken shale. This has led to North Dakota having the lowest employment of any state in the country, and the Williston area is right at the boom's epicenter.
Now, in what follows, we're going to ignore the fact that the continued extraction of oil from the Bakken shale is actively contributing to the warming of our planet and the concomitant impending destruction of society as we know it, and choose instead to focus on the specific economic arguments.
See, Dr. Perry is using the example of this one Walmart situated in the middle of perhaps the strongest economy in the state to argue for Walmart and against the minimum wage. Either he's dumber than a bag of hammers, or he thinks his readers are, and it's hard to tell which.
In his first point, Professor Perry notes the first and most obvious thing about about the store in Williston: the comparison between the wages at the store in Williston with Walmart's average wages nationwide indicate that, yes, even Walmart has to respond to the market forces prevalent in a particular community in order to get its stores staffed.
Yes, Walmart won't be able to staff its stores if it attempted to pay minimum wage in Williston—but that doesn't mean that market forces require Walmart to pay lower wages in other places. Perry's apparent confusion on this issue is illustrative of a significant difference between upward pressure and downward pressure on wages: upward pressure on wages sets a higher floor for businesses to be able to get labor at all.
Downward pressure, on the other hand, allows businesses to use wage levels as a determiner of company values and strategy. A Costco and a Walmart in the same general vicinity are subject to the same wage pressures, but Costco chooses to pay a higher wage to engender higher employee loyalty and morale, along with its corresponding effects on customer satisfaction.
Walmart, on the other hand, chooses to exploit its labor by seeking it out at the lowest possible price, and expecting government to pick up the remaining tab through social services. In short, Walmart could choose to pay higher wages: after all, if it weren't profitable to keep the store in Williston open despite the comparatively high labor costs, Walmart would simply close it down.
But Dr. Perry isn't just using the example of this one store to mistakenly defend Walmart's business practices. Instead, he and AEI are using it to attack the very concept of a minimum wage:
2. The fact that Walmart is paying almost 2.5 times the minimum wage in Williston, ND is evidence that a single, national minimum wage for every city, county, labor market in the country can’t possibly make sense. Even proponents of the minimum wage have to agree that a single national minimum can’t be optimal for every labor market in the country. In that case, they would logically have to support thousands of minimum wages tailored to thousands of local communities, or maybe even more logically agree that minimum wages are unworkable.
3. You probably won’t be hearing anybody calling for a $15 per hour “living wage” in North Dakota, since the entry level wages at Walmart's there are already above thatNow, as we break down this section, let's not forget that Perry is a professor of economics at the University of Michigan. Arguments like this are convincing evidence that Wolverine State taxpayers aren't getting their money's worth.
To begin with, Perry is assuming that
Walmart is by its very nature a minimum-wage employer, and will only pay
the lowest wage it can possibly get away with. But if Perry is
representative of his colleagues, it seems that AEI is so invested in
the supremacy of free markets that it has forgotten what the job of the
minimum wage is.
The entire point of a minimum wage is not to find what
the lowest wage is that the market will bear, and codify it. The minimum
wage exists as a tool for governments to contravene the very cheap
price that the free market places on human dignity, and to ensure that
those who work can theoretically enjoy some modicum of decency
regardless of what the free market might have otherwise intended for
them. The entire point of a minimum wage isn't to tailor it to every
single local community.
Instead, the point is to establish a floor that
will be functional for every community, regardless of whether upward
pressure on wages in boom towns like Williston is ensuring that nobody
will ever meet that floor. The same principle, of course, applies for
the concept of the living wage: if a local economy is putting such
upward pressure on wages that everyone is making a living wage, that's
fantastic in theory—but it doesn't change what a living wage is or why
it needs to exist. They exist because some businesses won't pay even
that much unless they absolutely have to.
This, of course, brings us to Perry's final, and most ridiculous, claim:
This, of course, brings us to Perry's final, and most ridiculous, claim:
5 (New). From Jon Murphy in the comments: Of course, what we also have here is a huge hole blown in the "we need minimum wage because businesses won't pay good wages" argument.Yep. This, after writing just a couple of paragraphs earlier that Walmart is only paying good wages in this one boomtown because the local economy gives them no other choice. It's simply amazing that material like this is being published on the website of one of the most active, longest-standing economic think tanks on the right. They're clearly scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Please Proceed: Republicans Hysterically Decide To Make Mitt Romney The Face of 2014
By Sarah Jones
Fooled again.
That CNN poll showing that Romney would beat Obama today in a hypothetical match really got Republicans dreaming. They ignore that Romney would lose in a hypothetical match against former secretary of state Hillary Clinton by 55 percent to 42 percent, and instead focus on how Romney would beat Obama in a hypothetical match. So they’re trying to sell Romney fever again. Romney is so popular, they tell us, that he’s out stumping for Republicans, while they claim no one wants to be seen with Obama.
So there, Obama! Take your 2012 mandate and shove it, because in a hypothetical match up, Romney totally unskewed that election!
Republican whisperer Robert Costa at the Washington Post reported that Mitt Romney is “emerging as one of the Republican Party’s most in-demand campaign surrogates.” He contrasted this with the fact that many Democrats are avoiding an “unpopular” President Obama. Since this is happening in areas where Republicans like Mitch McConnell are desperately trying to run against President Obama because his constituents conveniently believe the Republican lies about this President, it’s not hard to understand. But get back to me when Republicans use Mitt Romney to campaign in the inner city or hardcore Democratic areas. That’s apples to apples.
At any rate, the Mittpalooza is on, babies! Ro-mentum is real. 2016 is riiiight there. Per Costa:
But really. A hypothetical poll of an existing entity versus a fantasy entity is sort of like believing that the fantasy partner one has never had is a viable, better alternative to someone with whom one is in a long term relationship. It’s juvenile, childish and predictable, because people believe the grass is greener in their imagination.
Reality check: If there were an actual election right now with Mitt Romney in it, he would be in the news, and being in the news was never a positive thing for Mitt Romney. Thus, the public would be reminded of his out-of-touch cluelessness and his snide, sneering contempt for them. His wife would be lecturing them about the Romneys’ entitlement. The people would not be happy with the Royals.
As it is, the public has been beaten over the head with phony Obama scandals and a DC that is not working, disturbing foreign policy issues and not enough good paying jobs.
None of these things would be fixed with Mitt Romney at the helm.
Republicans might want to note that the CNN poll was heavy on landlines (622 to 350 on cells), which favors the older, typically Republican voter, and that still, Democratic Congressional candidates were consistently ahead of Republicans. That is the only election actually coming up in reality, and therefor the only election that is relevant. But it’s also relevant that Republicans continue to believe that Obama is massively unpopular. They believed this going into 2012. The media believed it, too. They had polls to back up their beliefs. But those polls were skewed Republican.
Right now, Congressional Democrats are raising money off of Republican attacks on President Obama. They ask supporters to have Obama’s back. They are getting Obama voters motivated to go to the polls — people who usually stay home in midterms. They would not be doing that if Obama were massively unpopular. The midterms favor Republicans, but Republicans are doing everything in their power do destroy their advantage, including attaching themselves to Mitt Romney. The Democrats only need five seconds to remind the public of why they chose Obama.
Does the public fantasize about a different person in the White House magically making Republicans do their jobs and thus changing things? Of course they do. That’s the entire point of the Republican obstruction. But only the very childish believe in comparing fantasy to reality. So, that means that Republicans are giddily shoving Mitt Romney out there.
The echoes of President Obama should warn them as Democrats smile, “Please proceed.”
Fooled again.
That CNN poll showing that Romney would beat Obama today in a hypothetical match really got Republicans dreaming. They ignore that Romney would lose in a hypothetical match against former secretary of state Hillary Clinton by 55 percent to 42 percent, and instead focus on how Romney would beat Obama in a hypothetical match. So they’re trying to sell Romney fever again. Romney is so popular, they tell us, that he’s out stumping for Republicans, while they claim no one wants to be seen with Obama.
So there, Obama! Take your 2012 mandate and shove it, because in a hypothetical match up, Romney totally unskewed that election!
Republican whisperer Robert Costa at the Washington Post reported that Mitt Romney is “emerging as one of the Republican Party’s most in-demand campaign surrogates.” He contrasted this with the fact that many Democrats are avoiding an “unpopular” President Obama. Since this is happening in areas where Republicans like Mitch McConnell are desperately trying to run against President Obama because his constituents conveniently believe the Republican lies about this President, it’s not hard to understand. But get back to me when Republicans use Mitt Romney to campaign in the inner city or hardcore Democratic areas. That’s apples to apples.
At any rate, the Mittpalooza is on, babies! Ro-mentum is real. 2016 is riiiight there. Per Costa:
Over three days in mid-August, Romney will campaign for GOP Senate and gubernatorial candidates in West Virginia, North Carolina and Arkansas, aides said. In September, he is planning visits to the presidential swing states of Colorado and Virginia.
Romney is filling up his October schedule, as well. Senate hopefuls in Iowa and New Hampshire are eager for him to return before November’s midterms, while Romney is weighing trips to other Senate battlegrounds. At least one high-profile Senate campaign said it has produced a television advertisement featuring Romney ready to air in the fall.
“Democrats don’t want to be associated with Barack Obama right now, but Republicans are dying to be associated with Mitt Romney,” said Spencer Zwick, a longtime Romney confidant who chaired his national finance council.
He added: “Candidates, campaigns and donors in competitive races are calling saying, ‘Can we get Mitt here?’ They say, ‘We’ve looked at the polling, and Mitt Romney moves the needle for us.’ That’s somewhat unexpected for someone who lost the election.”Republicans will believe anything, apparently, except reality. No science, no medicine, no physics, no history — but Ro-mentum! All of this because of one poll. As if it weren’t skewed, inaccurate polls that got them into this mess in the first place. Get back to us when Republicans use him in Los Angeles, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, or any other Democratic stronghold.
But really. A hypothetical poll of an existing entity versus a fantasy entity is sort of like believing that the fantasy partner one has never had is a viable, better alternative to someone with whom one is in a long term relationship. It’s juvenile, childish and predictable, because people believe the grass is greener in their imagination.
Reality check: If there were an actual election right now with Mitt Romney in it, he would be in the news, and being in the news was never a positive thing for Mitt Romney. Thus, the public would be reminded of his out-of-touch cluelessness and his snide, sneering contempt for them. His wife would be lecturing them about the Romneys’ entitlement. The people would not be happy with the Royals.
As it is, the public has been beaten over the head with phony Obama scandals and a DC that is not working, disturbing foreign policy issues and not enough good paying jobs.
None of these things would be fixed with Mitt Romney at the helm.
Republicans might want to note that the CNN poll was heavy on landlines (622 to 350 on cells), which favors the older, typically Republican voter, and that still, Democratic Congressional candidates were consistently ahead of Republicans. That is the only election actually coming up in reality, and therefor the only election that is relevant. But it’s also relevant that Republicans continue to believe that Obama is massively unpopular. They believed this going into 2012. The media believed it, too. They had polls to back up their beliefs. But those polls were skewed Republican.
Right now, Congressional Democrats are raising money off of Republican attacks on President Obama. They ask supporters to have Obama’s back. They are getting Obama voters motivated to go to the polls — people who usually stay home in midterms. They would not be doing that if Obama were massively unpopular. The midterms favor Republicans, but Republicans are doing everything in their power do destroy their advantage, including attaching themselves to Mitt Romney. The Democrats only need five seconds to remind the public of why they chose Obama.
Does the public fantasize about a different person in the White House magically making Republicans do their jobs and thus changing things? Of course they do. That’s the entire point of the Republican obstruction. But only the very childish believe in comparing fantasy to reality. So, that means that Republicans are giddily shoving Mitt Romney out there.
The echoes of President Obama should warn them as Democrats smile, “Please proceed.”
Please Proceed: Republicans Hysterically Decide To Make Mitt Romney The Face of 2014 was written by Sarah Jones for PoliticusUSA.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)