Earning the title of Ed Schultz's Pretender, failed
Green Party Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader pens an unsolicited, negative
letter to Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Saturday, March 8, 2014
Hundreds of Native Women Missing in Canada
New database lists 824 murdered, missing native women in Canada
By Mary Agnes Welch
TREVOR HAGAN / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS FILES
Enlarge Image
Vigils for murdered and missing aboriginal women
are held regularly at the Manitoba legislature. New research puts the
total in this province at 111. Photo Store
Some of the names are familiar, such as Cherisse Houle, the 17-year-old found lying face down in a creek just outside Winnipeg.
Some are forgotten, such as Constance Cameron, whose murder 30 years ago has never been solved.
One name is famous -- Helen Betty Osborne, whose death is emblematic of violent racism in Manitoba.
Those names and hundreds more appear on a new public database, the first of its kind, created by an Ottawa researcher. It pegs the number of missing and murdered aboriginal women in Canada at 824.
That's significantly higher than the widely used and often-criticized number of 582, cobbled together by the Native Women's Association of Canada (NWAC).
The NWAC's list was never public and could not be scrutinized or validated, but it helped catapult the issue of violence against indigenous women onto the national agenda.
The new research, which dug deeper into the past and the public record, shows the number of missing and murdered aboriginal women in Manitoba is 111, up from NWAC's oft-quoted figure of 79.
"I'm not shocked at the number and I know the community is not going to be shocked at the number because we've always said it was more," said Nahanni Fontaine, the province's special adviser on aboriginal women's issues. "And of course, each year, tragically, those numbers go up."
The new database is the first comprehensive and fully public list of missing and murdered aboriginal women, but activists in Ontario are working on a similar one for that province. The database was created by federal civil servant Maryanne Pearce and forms part of her PhD thesis for the University of Ottawa's law school.
The thesis, along with the database, were submitted last fall and are available online.
To gather a complete list of names, Pearce spent seven years cross-referencing newspaper articles, police websites and reports, court documents and other public sources, much as the NWAC did.
Pearce identified thousands of missing and murdered women and was able to determine 824 were Inuit, Métis or First Nations. Her list includes 115 Manitoba women, but further research suggests four young women listed as missing have been found, two recently.
Pearce could not be reached for comment this week, but her thesis advisers are two well-regarded experts in aboriginal law and social science research.
When contacted about Pearce's work, they called it "excellent."
Among her findings, Pearce found 80 per cent of missing or murdered aboriginal women were not in the sex trade. That's despite the perception most cases involve prostitutes or women engaged in high-risk behaviour.
The perception that many missing or murdered women put themselves in harm's way has been used to unfairly discount the problem, said Derek Nepinak, Grand Chief of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs.
Shawna Ferris, a University of Manitoba gender studies professor, agreed, saying much of the reporting on missing and murdered aboriginal women focuses on whether the victims are involved in the sex trade. Mug shots and details of a woman's street life or addictions don't help to cultivate
public concern.
"Shouldn't we be aiming for a city where regardless of the trials people are going through, they're not killed?"
Nepinak said a comprehensive list that can been tested and validated makes it difficult for government, especially Ottawa, to sidestep the issue, and helps bolster the case for a national inquiry into the epidemic of violence against aboriginal women.
"We've only scratched the surface of what happened here," Nepinak said.
maryagnes.welch@freepress.mb.ca
Some are forgotten, such as Constance Cameron, whose murder 30 years ago has never been solved.
Constance Cameron, murdered in 1984
Canada's Missing and Murdered Women
As part of her PhD thesis, federal civil servant Maryanne Pearce created her own database of missing and murdered women in Canada, cross-referencing newspaper articles, police websites and reports, court documents and other public sources. We’ve created an online database based on Appendix F of her thesis – a list of more than 3,300 cases of missing or dead Canadian women. See the database.MANITOBA'S MISSING AND MURDERED ABORIGINAL WOMEN AND GIRLS
- 111 missing or murdered dating back to Jean Mocharski's murder near the Alexander Docks in 1961.
- 83 aboriginal women have been murdered over the last 50 years. About a third of the murders are unsolved.
- 28 women are missing, including 18 in the last decade.
- 10 children (aged 11 and under) were murdered, including Phoenix Sinclair.
- 20 is the average age of the missing and murdered women (among those whose ages are known).
- 6 women were murdered by their husband or boyfriend.
Related Items
Cherisse Houle, murdered in 2009
Helen Betty Osborne, murdered in 1971 (CANADIAN PRESS)
One name is famous -- Helen Betty Osborne, whose death is emblematic of violent racism in Manitoba.
Those names and hundreds more appear on a new public database, the first of its kind, created by an Ottawa researcher. It pegs the number of missing and murdered aboriginal women in Canada at 824.
That's significantly higher than the widely used and often-criticized number of 582, cobbled together by the Native Women's Association of Canada (NWAC).
The NWAC's list was never public and could not be scrutinized or validated, but it helped catapult the issue of violence against indigenous women onto the national agenda.
The new research, which dug deeper into the past and the public record, shows the number of missing and murdered aboriginal women in Manitoba is 111, up from NWAC's oft-quoted figure of 79.
"I'm not shocked at the number and I know the community is not going to be shocked at the number because we've always said it was more," said Nahanni Fontaine, the province's special adviser on aboriginal women's issues. "And of course, each year, tragically, those numbers go up."
The new database is the first comprehensive and fully public list of missing and murdered aboriginal women, but activists in Ontario are working on a similar one for that province. The database was created by federal civil servant Maryanne Pearce and forms part of her PhD thesis for the University of Ottawa's law school.
The thesis, along with the database, were submitted last fall and are available online.
To gather a complete list of names, Pearce spent seven years cross-referencing newspaper articles, police websites and reports, court documents and other public sources, much as the NWAC did.
Pearce identified thousands of missing and murdered women and was able to determine 824 were Inuit, Métis or First Nations. Her list includes 115 Manitoba women, but further research suggests four young women listed as missing have been found, two recently.
Pearce could not be reached for comment this week, but her thesis advisers are two well-regarded experts in aboriginal law and social science research.
When contacted about Pearce's work, they called it "excellent."
Among her findings, Pearce found 80 per cent of missing or murdered aboriginal women were not in the sex trade. That's despite the perception most cases involve prostitutes or women engaged in high-risk behaviour.
The perception that many missing or murdered women put themselves in harm's way has been used to unfairly discount the problem, said Derek Nepinak, Grand Chief of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs.
Shawna Ferris, a University of Manitoba gender studies professor, agreed, saying much of the reporting on missing and murdered aboriginal women focuses on whether the victims are involved in the sex trade. Mug shots and details of a woman's street life or addictions don't help to cultivate
public concern.
"Shouldn't we be aiming for a city where regardless of the trials people are going through, they're not killed?"
Nepinak said a comprehensive list that can been tested and validated makes it difficult for government, especially Ottawa, to sidestep the issue, and helps bolster the case for a national inquiry into the epidemic of violence against aboriginal women.
"We've only scratched the surface of what happened here," Nepinak said.
maryagnes.welch@freepress.mb.ca
College Board announces SAT overhaul
Chris Hayes discusses the newly announced overhaul of the SATs with
NYU’s Pedro Noguera, Seppy Basili of Kaplan Test Prep, and education
activist Julie Cavanagh.
Friday, March 7, 2014
12 Common Dreams and What They Supposedly Mean
By Meredith Danko
Despite
Freud’s well-documented beliefs, dream interpretation isn’t a
straightforward method. In fact, the majority of modern scientists and
psychologists accept dreams and their meanings as unsolved mysteries.
Regardless, there are some extremely common dreams that we all keep
having.
Though most psychologists disagree with the current
state of dream interpretation, people still choose to consult so-called
dream experts. Often times, these analysts disagree. To get a clear
picture, we will examine the viewpoints of four authors. Lauri
Loewenberg has written three books on this topic and has appeared on The Dr. Oz Show and Anderson Cooper 360. Ian Wallace is a dream psychologist who wrote The Complete A to Z Dictionary of Dreams. Russell Grant published The Illustrated Dream Dictionary, which connects symbols in dreams with waking life. Finally, Lauren Lawrence has a New York Daily News column on dream analysis and was the host of the show Celebrity Nightmares Decoded. Based on these four sources, here are 12 common dreams and interpretations.
1. Falling
Loewenberg calls
this dream a “red flag from your subconscious.” She believes this dream
is common in people who are having a major life problem with work,
relationships, or elsewhere. Grant’s work concurs with this viewpoint,
even citing the same examples.
2. Teeth falling out
The experts greatly disagree on this one. Wallace views
teeth as a symbol of power and confidence. This dream is supposedly a
sign that something happened in the dreamer’s life that has caused him
or her to lose confidence. According to Grant, teeth are a bad omen and
represent a broken relationship. Lawrence has a Freudian answer to this
dream. For women, she believes the dream is an example of
wish-fulfillment—they want to become pregnant. For men, it is a desire
for sexual stimulation.
3. Showing up to work or school naked
The experts largely agree that this dream represents vulnerability and anxiety. Wallace’s research reveals that this dream is “common to people who have accepted a promotion, gone off to a new job, or who are coming into public view.”
4. Test-taking
Lawrence has observed that only perfectionists tend to have recurring stressful test-taking dreams. She alleges
that the dream reminds a person to stay alert. Loewenberg believes that
in adults, these dreams draw parallels between school and a job.
Because both places see a lot of pressure-filled situations, Loewenberg
associates this dream with work stress.
5. Dying
Lawrence’s interpretation
is that this dream “reveals the wish to terminate something in life: a
relationship, a job, a career path, or even the past.” Grant’s
dictionary emphasizes that this dream is not necessarily a nightmare.
Rather, he repeatedly states that it is a dream meant to encourage a
person to embark on a new endeavor or fresh start.
6. Meeting a celebrity
Getty Images
Wallace names this as one of the dreams his clients
have the most. He believes the actual celebrity is relevant and may
reveal what talents the dreamer values. In Dream on It, Loewenberg writes that celebrities are a symbol of a personal need for recognition.
7. Being chased
Despite the nightmarish feel of this dream, Wallace
considers it a positive sign. He believes that this dream is supposed to
encourage the dreamer to finally face a problem that has been hanging
over his or her head. Loewenberg encounters this dream more often in
women than men.
8. Partner is cheating
Most of these authorities agree that this dream should
not be taken as clairvoyance. According to Loewenberg, “The cheating
dream happens when your mate is spending too much time and attention on
something that does not involve you.” Similarly, Lawrence notes a lack of trust in a romantic relationship tends to spark this dream.
9. Showing up late to something
This dream might be a sign that someone is overwhelmed
and doing too much, according to Wallace. On a related note, Grant
interprets this lateness as a warning: “Don’t make promises you can’t
keep.”
10. Flying
Wallace claims
that the dream encourages a person to let go of current issues and
allow things to ”fall naturally into place.” Similarly, flying is a sign
that there is an out of control situation in real life, according to
Grant.
See Also: 6 Surprising Things That Can Influence Your Dreams11. Being pregnant
Grant understands this dream as a sign that the
dreamer is having problems. Lawrence views it as a need, either to start
a creative project or become a parent. Or the dream may be
representative of a new idea that has recently come to the person, as
Loewenberg believes.
12. Driving an out-of-control vehicle
The interpretations of this dream are just as cliché as expected. For example, Wallace writes,
“You may feel that you don’t have enough control on your road to
success.” Grant warns that this is a sign that a current bad habit may
become a long-term problem.
All images courtesy of Thinkstock unless otherwise noted.
‘I Am Prepared To Run For President Of The United States’
By Alan Colmes
The prepared person is Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, hinted in November that he’d look at 2016.
…Sanders has begun talking with savvy progressive political strategists, traveling to unexpected locations such as Alabama and entertaining the process questions that this most issue-focused member of the Senate has traditionally avoided.
In some senses, Sanders is the unlikeliest of prospects: an independent who caucuses with the Democrats in the Senate but has never joined the party, a democratic socialist in a country where many politicians fear the label “liberal,” an outspoken critic of the economic, environmental and social status quo who rips “the ruling class” and calls out the Koch brothers by name. Yet, he has served as the mayor of his state’s largest city, beaten a Republican incumbent for the US House, won and held a historically Republican Senate seat and served longer as an independent member of Congress than anyone else. And he says his political instincts tell him America is ready for a “political revolution.”The big question is whether Sanders runs as an independent, which he is, or as a Democrat, a party with which he caucuses, but with which he many differences.
……there is no question that the Democratic Party in general remains far too dependent on big-money interests, that it is not fighting vigorously for working-class families, and that there are some members of the Democratic Party whose views are not terribly different from some of the Republicans. That’s absolutely the case. But the dilemma is that, if you run outside of the Democratic Party, then what you’re doing—and you have to think hard about this—you’re not just running a race for president, you’re really running to build an entire political movement.And what is wrong with the nominee-apparent, Hillary Clinton?
…the same old same old [Clinton administration Secretary of the Treasury] Robert Rubin type of economics, or centrist politics, or continued dependence on big money, or unfettered free-trade, that is not what this country needs ideologically. That is not the type of policy that we need. And it is certainly not going to be the politics that galvanizes the tens of millions of people today who are thoroughly alienated and disgusted with the status quo.
Wednesday, March 5, 2014
A middle-finger salute for the fracking king
By Jim Hightower
Rex Tillerson is mad. In fact, Fracking Mad.
This 61 year old farmer from Bartonville, Texas is another victim of Big Oil's fracking boom that has invaded people's homes and lives from upstate New York to Southern California. Polluted air, contaminated water, depleted aquifers, multiple health problems, and even an inexplicable epidemic of earthquakes are a few of the side effects caused by this massively-destructive drilling process.
But the frackers hadn't counted on Rex getting mad, speaking out, and suing the bastards. What ticked off Tillerson was the erection of a 160-foot-tall water tower built by a company that can provide millions of gallons of water for fracking gas wells. But Rex is no environmentalist, so his objection is not to the waste and contamination of people's water, nor does he object at all to fracking.
Rather, he's hopping mad because the 15-story tower stands above the tree line on his 83-acre, $5-million horse farm, spoiling his view.
Tillerson, you see, is not just some local dirt farmer. He says he and his wife moved here to have a weekend getaway so they can enjoy the rural lifestyle. He's not a farmer, at all – unless you count "farming the government" and harvesting billions of dollars in special tax breaks and subsidies. Rex (whose name means "king" in Latin), is the $40-million-a-year CEO of Exxon Mobil. Now, guess which oil giant is the biggest fracker in the USA. Right? Exxon Mobil.
So what we have here is a case of "phallic justice" – an upright, cylindrical water tower that's part of the fracking infrastructure, symbolically extending the middle-finger salute to Exxon's CEO every time he visits his horsey farm. How fitting that a guy who’s gained a personal fortune from the ugliness of fracking now has some of that ugliness right in his face.
"Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson gets 15 percent raise to $40.3 million," www.dallasnews.com, April 12, 2013.
"Exxon CEO Joins Suit Citing Fracking Concerns," www.wsj.com, February 20, 2014.
"Colorado Becomes First State to Regulate Methane Emissions From Fracking," www.alternet.org, February 25, 2014.
"Water tower suit involving Exxon's CEO prompts a fracking fracas," www.star-telegram.com, February 24, 2014.
"Exxon CEO Comes Out Against Fracking Project Because It Will Affect His Property Values," www.thinkprogress.org, February 21, 2014.
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
CEO sues to keep fracking away from backyard
Chris Hayes looks at Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson’s lawsuit tied to fracking.
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Mitch McConnell Tastes His Own Medicine in Attack Ad by Senate Conservatives Fund
By Brad Friedman
This is what politics now looks like inside the Republican Party, where Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is staring down the double barrels of a very aggressive "Tea Party" primary challenge from Matt Bevin, and then a very close contest with Democratic general election candidate and Kentucky Sec. of State Alison Lundergan Grimes...
Remember, that ad is by fellow Republicans. In other words, the ridiculous and toxic (if too often effective) tactics they've been using for years against Democrats are now being deployed against each other.
As Josh Marshall said when flagging the ad above, "I guess you make your own bed." Or, perhaps, as the most most haunting movie ad ever said: "The call is coming from inside the house."
Good luck with that, Republicans. You are what you eat.
This is what politics now looks like inside the Republican Party, where Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) is staring down the double barrels of a very aggressive "Tea Party" primary challenge from Matt Bevin, and then a very close contest with Democratic general election candidate and Kentucky Sec. of State Alison Lundergan Grimes...
Remember, that ad is by fellow Republicans. In other words, the ridiculous and toxic (if too often effective) tactics they've been using for years against Democrats are now being deployed against each other.
As Josh Marshall said when flagging the ad above, "I guess you make your own bed." Or, perhaps, as the most most haunting movie ad ever said: "The call is coming from inside the house."
Good luck with that, Republicans. You are what you eat.
Scott Walker's weak attempt to avoid controversy
Wisconsin Govenor Scott Walker desperately tries to bury details of a new scandal, as his
past actions against unions makes headlines. Ed Schultz and panel discuss.
Sunday, February 23, 2014
President Obama says no to Social Security cuts
President Obama is doing what critics have urged him to do for years:
he’s saying what he wants. His new budget will say no to austerity and
no to Social Security cuts. Richard Wolffe and Joy Reid discuss.
Friday, February 21, 2014
Super Mario Bros 3 Hacked To Feature Save Game Functionality
By Cauterize
Super Mario Bros 3 is without a doubt one of the greatest games ever made - but can how can you improve a near flawless classic? One Nintendo NES fan decided to bring new functionality to the 1988 platformer, by introducing something retro gamers with busy lives will appreciate - built in save game functionality.
This simple yet effective ROM hack is the latest patch to hit the retro gaming scene, and one that will solve many classic gaming headaches. Given how expansive Super Mario Bros 3's many worlds are, the ability to power off the console and resume the action much later on is something we can all make use of.
Having said that, seasoned retro gamers will no doubt be questioning the point of using this ROM hack, especially when most Nintendo NES emulators out there support save states. The difference here is that owners of Nintendo NES flash cartridges (such as the Everdrive N8) wanting the more authentic experience can now make the most of this improved classic on the original hardware - saving their progress throughout the Mushroom World.
As usual, to enjoy this ROM enhancement patch you will need to have an original Super Mario Bros 3 Nintendo NES ROM file to which you can apply this patch to. Full instructions on how to patch this ROM can be found within the download, or you can refer to this handy ROM patching guide on YouTube.
Download Super Mario Bros 3 Save Game Patch
Super Mario Bros 3 is without a doubt one of the greatest games ever made - but can how can you improve a near flawless classic? One Nintendo NES fan decided to bring new functionality to the 1988 platformer, by introducing something retro gamers with busy lives will appreciate - built in save game functionality.
This simple yet effective ROM hack is the latest patch to hit the retro gaming scene, and one that will solve many classic gaming headaches. Given how expansive Super Mario Bros 3's many worlds are, the ability to power off the console and resume the action much later on is something we can all make use of.
Having said that, seasoned retro gamers will no doubt be questioning the point of using this ROM hack, especially when most Nintendo NES emulators out there support save states. The difference here is that owners of Nintendo NES flash cartridges (such as the Everdrive N8) wanting the more authentic experience can now make the most of this improved classic on the original hardware - saving their progress throughout the Mushroom World.
As usual, to enjoy this ROM enhancement patch you will need to have an original Super Mario Bros 3 Nintendo NES ROM file to which you can apply this patch to. Full instructions on how to patch this ROM can be found within the download, or you can refer to this handy ROM patching guide on YouTube.
Download Super Mario Bros 3 Save Game Patch
Thursday, February 20, 2014
Here’s What Happens in Florida When A Black Man Stands His Ground
By Curtis F
It’s an unfortunate fact that certain states’ “Stand Your Ground” laws are getting tested more and more these days. In fact, in Florida alone, deaths that are ruled as “justifiable homicides” increased 283% between the time the law was enacted and 2010. This is now a sad reality, but many people would claim that the law is a good one since it allows people to defend themselves when they believe their lives are in danger. Much like the Jim Crow laws of the past, however, “Stand Your Ground” is beginning to look more and more like a racially biased law disguised in the cloak of legal necessity.
The
Giles case began when the young man, who had just finished out a second
tour in the Middle East, went to a nightclub with his friends. At the
club, a fight suddenly broke out outside between 30 to 40 different
individuals. The young man was not even part of the fight, but fearing
for his safety since he couldn’t find his friends, he retrieved a gun
from his vehicle, which he had a concealed carry permit for, placed it
in his pocket, and went to find his buddies.
The young father of three, who was looking forward to a promising career in the military, was quickly arrested, charged with second-degree attempted murder, and convicted of a lesser charge which landed him in prison for what equates to a life sentence. Somehow, Jack Campbell, a Florida assistant attorney general, was able to look at the jury with a straight face and say:
Oh, wait.
In fact, a recent article listing statistics related to Florida’s “Stand your Ground” law shows some disturbing trends. While around 70% of all individuals who use the defense are exonerated, the numbers prove that the law is more geared to protecting white individuals. This can be seen by the fact that 73% of people who kill an African-American and use the defense are freed. Conversely, only 59% of individuals who invoke the defense after killing a white person get the same treatment.
Anyone who isn’t blinded by some form of prejudice would literally have to be mentally defunct to not recognize the Giles case as an open-and-shut instance of “Stand your Ground,” but unfortunately, gun rights advocates aren’t screaming for his release. This task has been left to his parents, who are both veterans, and Americans who are demanding some form of justice. Sadly, Governor Rick Scott is ignoring demands for clemency, and this is even after nearly 80,000 people (as of Feb. 17) have signed a petition demanding action.
You can sign the petition here.
Photo from Michael Giles’ family via a petition to commute his sentence on Change.Org. Click here to sign.
It’s an unfortunate fact that certain states’ “Stand Your Ground” laws are getting tested more and more these days. In fact, in Florida alone, deaths that are ruled as “justifiable homicides” increased 283% between the time the law was enacted and 2010. This is now a sad reality, but many people would claim that the law is a good one since it allows people to defend themselves when they believe their lives are in danger. Much like the Jim Crow laws of the past, however, “Stand Your Ground” is beginning to look more and more like a racially biased law disguised in the cloak of legal necessity.
An obvious case of “Stand Your Ground.”
In what is quickly becoming a rallying call against the racial bias of “Stand Your Ground” laws, a young U.S. airman, Michael Giles, was sentenced to 25 years in a Florida prison after shooting a man, who happened to be attacking him, in the leg. That’s right: no death actually occurred in the incident, but Giles was sentenced to 25 years. What makes this even more disheartening is the fact that, in an unrelated case, a Missouri man only received 20 years for actually murdering a man who was only leaving a residence.A random attack on an innocent victim
While searching for his friends, a stranger came out of nowhere and punched Giles to the ground. This assailant even admitted that he planned on punching the first person that he came upon. In an obvious act of self defense — what “Stand Your Ground” laws are supposedly for — Giles shot his assailant in the leg. Unfortunately, several fragments broke away from the bullet and injured two others.The young father of three, who was looking forward to a promising career in the military, was quickly arrested, charged with second-degree attempted murder, and convicted of a lesser charge which landed him in prison for what equates to a life sentence. Somehow, Jack Campbell, a Florida assistant attorney general, was able to look at the jury with a straight face and say:
“There is no self-defense that is applicable based on the evidence that’s before the jury.”Because an admission from the “victim” saying that he randomly attacked Giles doesn’t prove Giles needed to defend himself.
Oh, wait.
Are “Stand Your Ground” laws rotten to the core?
Sadly, Giles isn’t the first to fall victim to a system that seems to pick and choose when it will apply the “Stand your Ground” doctrine. In fact, public outcry occurred when Marissa Alexander, a Florida mother, was sentenced to 20 years for firing a warning shot at her husband after the two had been engaged in a physical altercation. Even worse is the sad realization that there was a history of domestic violence against the woman who was defending herself. Fortunately, she will get a retrial, but when looking at Florida’s statistics related to the law, it’s not promising that a different verdict will be reached.In fact, a recent article listing statistics related to Florida’s “Stand your Ground” law shows some disturbing trends. While around 70% of all individuals who use the defense are exonerated, the numbers prove that the law is more geared to protecting white individuals. This can be seen by the fact that 73% of people who kill an African-American and use the defense are freed. Conversely, only 59% of individuals who invoke the defense after killing a white person get the same treatment.
Anyone who isn’t blinded by some form of prejudice would literally have to be mentally defunct to not recognize the Giles case as an open-and-shut instance of “Stand your Ground,” but unfortunately, gun rights advocates aren’t screaming for his release. This task has been left to his parents, who are both veterans, and Americans who are demanding some form of justice. Sadly, Governor Rick Scott is ignoring demands for clemency, and this is even after nearly 80,000 people (as of Feb. 17) have signed a petition demanding action.
You can sign the petition here.
How to Disassemble Vita Game Cartridges, by Yifan Lu
By wololo
A useful piece of advice for the hardware tinkerers among us, directly from Yifan Lu.
If you’ve been following Yifan Lu’s work, or, more recently, the various ongoing hardware hacks by katsu (His HDMI output mod, his attempts to exploit the Vita NAND, his dual firmware boot prototype), you know we’re quite excited to see any progress on the hardware side of the force.
Opening a Vita cartridge in itself is not useful, but for those of you willing to dig deeper in the internals of the Vita, looking into the game cartridges is one more step you might want to take. Yifan Lu’s technique might be obvious to those who have been looking into these cartridges for a while, but if you’re curious and don’t want to permanently damage your game, you might want to follow his “how to”:
Based on the information from his blog, and Katsu’s recent work, Yifan also
explains how games could potentially be dumped with standard NAND dumping
techniques. He mentions this is probably as close to piracy as he’s ever gonna
get, so I wouldn’t expect any additional information on that front from him.
Source Yifan
Lu
A useful piece of advice for the hardware tinkerers among us, directly from Yifan Lu.
If you’ve been following Yifan Lu’s work, or, more recently, the various ongoing hardware hacks by katsu (His HDMI output mod, his attempts to exploit the Vita NAND, his dual firmware boot prototype), you know we’re quite excited to see any progress on the hardware side of the force.
Opening a Vita cartridge in itself is not useful, but for those of you willing to dig deeper in the internals of the Vita, looking into the game cartridges is one more step you might want to take. Yifan Lu’s technique might be obvious to those who have been looking into these cartridges for a while, but if you’re curious and don’t want to permanently damage your game, you might want to follow his “how to”:
If you take a look at the top right or left corner of the game cart, you can see a line of where the two halves of the plastic was glued together. Locate the upper left corner and, with a sharp knife, push the blade into the line on the corner until you have a small dent. Then, move the knife downwards and wiggle the knife until you loosen the glue for the entire left side of the cart. Then keep moving the knife down and when you hit the bottom of the cart, turn and lose about half the bottom edge of the cart. Now you can use your fingers to spread the two halves apart (but be careful not to use too much force and tear the glue from the other two edges), and you can either shake the memory chip out or use a pair of tweezers.As usual, Yifan Lu shares some cool pictures on his blog, where more details can be found (link below).
Source Yifan Lu
If you were to follow the pinout, you can see that it appears to be a standard NAND pinout (not eMMC and not Memory Stick Duo). I have not tested this, but I believe this means you can use NANDWay or any other NAND dumping technique (there’s lots for PS3 and Xbox 360) provided you attach to the right pins. I suspect that the Vita communicates with the game cart through the SD protocol with an additional line for a security interface, but that is just speculation. If that were the case, having one-to-one dumps would not allow you to create clone games. Regardless, I will not be looking too much into game carts because they are so closely tied with piracy.NANDWay can be downloaded here as part of the NORway tool.
Pinout for Vita cartridge – Katsu
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Don Tollefson Turns Himself In, Faces Fraud Charges
A former Philadelphia sportscaster sat in jail
Tuesday night after turning himself into authorities for allegedly
cheating charities out of more than $100,000.
During an arraignment scheduled to
begin at noon, Magisterial District Judge Daniel J. Finello set bail for
61 year old Donald Tollefson at $250,000, according to court records.
Unable to post the required 10 percent, the former sportscaster for 6 ABC and FOX 29 was held at the Bucks County jail.
Tollefson faces first- and
third-degree felonies and misdemeanors and will next appear in court
for a preliminary hearing on Feb. 27, court records show.
The charges arose after some Eagles
fans told police they never received the tickets and other items they
purchased at charity auctions.
"He scammed us with a smile on his face," said Cindy
Moffitt. "He put himself right up there with God and Santa Claus as far
as I'm concerned."
She bought a $500 package to attend
an Eagles game in Denver when she attended the Officer Brad Fox
Foundation 5K Run in April 2012.
But, Moffitt says, the day she was supposed to travel to Colorado for the game, Tollefson told her there were no tickets.
"I thought if I don't stop this, it is going to
continue," said Moffitt, who was initially hestitant to go to the
police. "He hasn't even said he's sorry."
Tollefson, who acknowledged his
addiction issues during the arraignment by telling the judge he has been
sober for 131 days, did not address the charges.
"We look forward to our day in court," said
Tollefson's attorney, Michael McGovern. "We expect at the end of these
proceedings he will be exonerated of all these charges."
Shortly after the arraignment began
Tuesday, the Bucks County District Attorney's Office asked any potential
victims to contact them.
Anyone who believes they may have
been victimized by Donald Tollefson, please call Warminster Detective
Bonargo: 215-343-0100, 215-672-1000
The NBC10 Investigators first reported that Don Tollefson was expected to surrender in Bucks County Tuesday on counts including theft, fraud and solicitation charges.
"The evidence to date shows that
Tollefson, over the past three years, fraudulently solicited money for
charities -- including the Special Olympics of Pennsylvania, the
Salvation Army, and the Brad Fox Foundation -- then misappropriated that
money. The investigation shows Tollefson victimized more than 100
individuals and misappropriated more than $100,000."
In January, a Montgomery County judge told Tollefson
to pay up $3,300 to an Allentown couple he promised a Super Bowl trip
to. That was just one of a slew of promised trips that were
allegedly never delivered.
Earlier, police confirmed
they investigated the former Philadelphia sportscaster after questions
surfaced about his charity and Eagles tickets promised to people who
made donations.
Warminster Police, along with the
Bucks County District Attorney's Office and the State Bureau of
Corporations & Charitable Organizations took a look at Tollefson's
alleged actions.
Tollefson, who was a broadcaster for
the Philadelphia Eagles in 2011 and 2012, has done fundraising for
disadvantaged children for more than a decade. During his fundraising,
Tollefson often auctioned off Eagles tickets, not receiving public
complaints at first.
Last January however when Anthony
Taormina, a manager for an East Norriton bowling alley, claimed he
bought six ticket packages for Eagles away games for about $4,500 at
Tollefson’s Wounded Warriors fundraiser.
“I figured the money was going
toward the charity,” he said. “I was going to get two nights at a hotel,
two tickets to the game and airfare for two people to go.”
Taormina says he never received the ticket package.
Micki Keane also says she bought tickets at the same event.
“We thought it was a great opportunity for the wounded warrior,” she said. “I have a nephew in Afghanistan.”
Keane claimed tickets never
materialized, even after she sent an angry email to Tollefson claiming
he “did not delay in charging $4,500” to her credit card. Keane also said
the money was charged to a different charity, “Winning Ways Education,”
instead of “Wounded Warriors.”
“He did eventually call me back and
said he was sorry,” Keane said. “He said because of the change in
leadership at the Eagles there were some issues. But he said he would
take care of it.”
Tollefson also served as the emcee for the Officer Brad Fox Foundation 5K Run
in Warminster in April 2012. The foundation’s Facebook page posted a
message claiming Tollefson promised half the proceeds from selling
ticket packages would go to the foundation. However, the latest posting
states, “We want to note we have not received any donations from Don
Tollefson.”
Barbara Terra says she spent $500 on a deal Tollefson offered during the event to go to an Eagles game in Denver.
"Nicest guy in the world when you
talk to him," she said. "But he's a flat out liar. He continually kept
saying he'd get back to me and that he'd have it by Wednesday night at
10 o'clock. I emailed him to let him know I was still waiting on my
husband's information. And then... we heard the trip was off."
Mark Sandor, says he met Tollefson
in July at a Wounded Warriors charity event in Avalon, N.J.
Sandor says
he paid $1,800 in a silent auction to get 2014 season tickets for the
Eagles.
Sandor claims his credit card was
charged two days later but after several back and forth emails with
Tollefson, there were red flags that something was wrong.
"The receipt here is for Winning
Ways but the donation's coordinator is One Child Saved," Sandor said. "I
don't necessarily know what that is because the whole event was Wounded
Warriors. It almost leaves me speechless. We all trusted him."
Lou Berman, president of Louie's
Voice, an organization raising awareness on autism, says he and a fellow
board member bought tickets to the British Open and the US Open for
2014 at an event Tollefson was emceeing. After paying $4,500, Berman
claims they received nothing.
"We received no receipt, itinerary,
travel arrangements, confirmation, not even a thank you card," Berman
wrote in a released statement. "One of these trips we were going to
raffle to raise money for our new foundation 'Louie’s Voice' that
provides assistance to children and families that suffer from Autism.
Our toy drive will likely be canceled this year as we don’t have the
funds to put on the event, because we were hoping to auction the trip to
raise money. We are devastated that this has happened to us. So many
children who suffer from autism will be disappointed."
Eagles management received several calls in relation to Tollefson.
“We have spoken with Don Tollefson
and have expressed our concerns about this situation,” said an Eagles
spokesperson last fall. “To be clear, the Philadelphia Eagles do not
have any affiliation with Mr. Tollefson and he was not authorized to use
our trademarked logo.”
NBC10 tried to reach Tollefson for comment. He has not yet gotten back to us however. Earlier, Tollefson denied the allegations against him while speaking to the Times Herald.
“The trips weren’t held up to the
standard they had been before,” he told the paper. “I made a personal
decision not to do them this year. “
State officials also say none of the
five charities Tollefson was associated with are registered. If a
charity collects less than $25,000 a year, registration is not required.
Any potential victims that haven't
come forward at this point can contact Warminster Township Police Det.
John Bonargo at (215) 343-0100 or (215) 672-1000.
As the police investigation continues, Keane says she just wants her money back.
“Everybody makes mistakes,” Keane said. “But, refund our money.”
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Jury reaches partial verdict in Dunn trial
The “Disrupt” panel discusses the jury deliberations in the murder trial
of Michael Dunn, after the jury reached a verdict on four out of the
five of the charges against Dunn.
Defense attorney: Dunn in ‘disbelief’ over verdict
Watch Michael Dunn’s defense attorney Cory Strolla make a statement on the verdict in his client’s murder trial.
Corey: Won’t ‘back off’ from Dunn retrial
Watch the entire statement from Florida State Attorney Angela Corey on the Michael Dunn verdict.
Sanders: Dunn could serve ‘consecutive or concurrent’ sentences
NBC’s Kerry Sanders reports on what could happen next in the sentencing for Michael Dunn.
Saturday, February 15, 2014
GOP senator tries to influence union vote
Sen. Bob Corker attempts to intimidate workers at the
Chattanooga Volkswagen plant, hours before a crucial vote to join the UAW. Ed
Schultz and workers discuss.
Billion dollar baby: Tom Perkins
Earning the title of Ed Schultz's "Pretender,"
glorified billionaire Tom Perkins once again whines about the liberals taking
all the money from the rich.
Friday, February 14, 2014
Chris Christie's Entire Career Reeks
It's not just the bridge
BY
What is remarkable about this
meltdown is that it isn’t the result of some deep secret that has been
exposed to the world, revealing a previously unimagined side to the
candidate. Many of the scandals and mini-scandals and
scandals-within-scandals that the national media is salivating over have
been in full view for years. Even the now-infamous Bridgegate was
percolating for months before it exploded into the first major story of
the next presidential race.
Case in point: Last year,
just before Thanksgiving, I traveled to Trenton to see Bill Baroni,
Christie’s top staff appointee at the Port Authority of New York and New
Jersey, get grilled by state legislators about the closure of access
lanes to the George Washington Bridge in September.
It was clear that something
fishy was going on. Baroni gave a command performance, defending the
closures as part of a traffic study, but more than that, as a matter of
justice. Discussing whether Fort Lee deserved three dedicated lanes
during rush hour, Baroni demanded, “Is this fair?” His voice actually
cracked with emotion. “And if it is not fair, how do you not study it?”
But there were only a handful of reporters in the room to witness his
melodramatics, and it was six weeks before the national media caught on
to the story.
Outside New Jersey, at least, it seemed inconceivable that
Christie, good-government evangelist, scourge of Soprano State
shenanigans, could preside over a piece of payback so outrageous and so
petty.
Now, of course, we know that there was no
traffic study and that the lanes were deliberately shut to punish the
mayor of Fort Lee, who had declined to endorse Christie for reelection.
(“Is it wrong that I’m smiling,” crowed a Christie aide in a text
message, even as congestion got so dire that ambulance workers were
forced to respond to an emergency on foot.)
We also know that this act
of retribution wasn’t an isolated incident: The mayor of Hoboken, to
name just one example, has claimed that Christie’s office pressured her
to approve a big development project represented by a Christie crony—or
risk losing recovery aid for damage caused by Hurricane Sandy.
And
yet, even post-Bridgegate, the prevailing interpretations of Christie
fundamentally miss the mark. He has been so singularly successful at
constructing his own mythology—as a reformer, a crusader, a bipartisan
problem-solver—that people have never really seen him clearly.
Over the
past three months, I talked to more than 50 people who have crossed
paths with Christie throughout his career—legislators, officials,
Democrats, Republicans, lawyers, longtime New Jersey politicos.
(Christie himself didn’t respond to a detailed request for comment.)
The
problem with Christie isn’t merely that he is a bully. It’s that his
political career is built on a rotten foundation. Christie owes his rise
to some of the most toxic forces in his state—powerful bosses who
ensure that his vow to clean up New Jersey will never come to pass. He
has allowed them to escape scrutiny, rewarded them for their support,
and punished their enemies. All along, even as it looked like Christie
was attacking the machine, he was really just mastering it.
Photo Illustration by Jacqueline Mellow
WOKE UP THIS MORNING AND ALL THAT LOVE HAD GONE
To
understand Chris Christie, first you have to understand that he was
raised to never give an inch. He grew up in the North Jersey suburb of
Livingston, to parents descended from big Newark clans—Sicilian for his
mother, Sandy; Irish-German for his father, Bill. The strength of their
marriage was exceeded only by the strength of their opinions. They
argued constantly—about money, about politics, about pretty much
everything.
Chris, the oldest child, was the family
mediator—reassuring his younger brother, Todd, and adopted sister, Dawn,
or barging into the fray to take his mother’s side. Not that Sandy
needed any help.
Funny, relentless, and willing to punctuate her point
with a raised middle finger, she got her way more often than not. “They
demanded a lot out of us,” Todd Christie told his brother’s biographers,
Bob Ingle and Michael Symons.
Anthony Hope, the
baseball coach at Livingston High School, told me about a game when
Chris got picked off third base, costing his team the win. That night,
all the kids headed to the town’s big Battle of the Bands, except Chris.
Hope, who was chaperoning, inquired where he was. He’d been
grounded—because of the game.
The Christie brothers
were close, but very different. Todd was a bro in the making—“an
outgoing, happy-go-lucky type,” says Hope. Chris was the serious one,
the type of kid who started running for office long before his first keg
party. He was known for introducing himself to other kids on the
playground as if he were a first-time candidate at the Iowa State Fair.
(“Hi, I’m Chris Christie.”) By the third grade, he was piping up at PTA
meetings to give his opinions on field trips and fund-raisers.
Whenever
the neighborhood boys played cowboys and Indians, Todd once reminisced,
Chris always opted to be the sheriff. At the age of 14, at Sandy’s
urging, he knocked on the front door of the local assemblyman, Tom Kean,
and asked for advice on how to get elected.
Associated Press
During Christie's term, Democratic boss George Norcross has become more powerful than ever.
Since
fate had placed Christie in New Jersey, he was about to get a very
particular kind of political education. In his senior year, he was one
of two students chosen to represent New Jersey in the Hearst
Foundation’s Senate Youth Program. The students were to spend a week
with their home-state senators, observing the legislative process from
the inside out. Unfortunately for Christie and his partner, the day
before they got to Washington, news broke of a massive FBI operation in
which a federal agent posing as an Arab sheik had bribed elected
officials with suitcases stuffed with cash.
Thus began
the season of Abscam, the elaborate sting that would eventually reel in
the mayor of Camden, six members of the House of Representatives, and
New Jersey’s senior senator, Harrison Williams, among others. That week,
Williams went to ground, and so, while all the other students got
pictures in the group yearbook with both their senators, the Jersey kids
only got a photo with one—Bill Bradley. “It was an incredible
embarrassment,” Christie later recalled. “We were the butt of jokes all
week.” In his telling, it was the defining moment that alerted him to
“the problem of corruption in New Jersey.”
To say that
corruption was a problem in the Garden State was an epic
understatement—its political system might as well have been expressly
designed to facilitate public fraud. The state’s official history is one
of legendary self-dealers: Enoch “Nucky” Johnson built and ruled
Prohibition-era Atlantic City from the ninth floor of the Ritz-Carlton.
The midcentury mayor of Jersey City, Frank Hague, earned a salary of
$8,500 a year and yet left office with a fortune of $2 million.
His
signature accoutrement, according to Jersey lore, was a desk with an
outward-facing drawer in which visitors would deposit their bribes. As
one mayor of Newark memorably put it, “There’s no money in being a
congressman, but you can make a million bucks as mayor.”
In
most of the United States, the big political machines have been broken,
or reduced to wheezing versions of their former selves. In New Jersey,
though, they’ve endured like nowhere else. The state has retained its
excessively local distribution of power—566 municipalities, 21 counties,
and innumerable commissions and authorities, all of them generous
repositories of contracts and jobs.
The place still has bona fide
bosses—perhaps not as colorful as the old ones, but about as powerful.
The bosses drum up campaign cash from people and firms seeking public
jobs and contracts, and direct it to candidates, who take care of the
bosses and the contributors—a self-perpetuating cycle as reliable as
photosynthesis.
When a brash young Christie decided to
wade into this swamp, casting himself as a reformer seemed like the
smart thing to do. By the time he was 31, Christie had married his
college sweetheart, Mary Pat (her first impression of him was as “a
student government geek”), gone on to law school, and then to a small
firm where he handled medical-malpractice cases and, later, securities
litigation and some state lobbying.
In 1994, he ran for a seat on the
Board of Chosen Freeholders in Morris County, the prosperous exurb where
he and Mary Pat, a Wall Street investment banker, had settled. It was
time, he declared, for an end to the cycle of campaign contributions
from those who did business with local government. “I’m sick and tired
of people hiring their political friends,” he said.
But
even as Christie was running against Jersey’s political culture, he was
willing to borrow some of its uglier tactics. One afternoon, Ed Tamm
Jr., a Republican he was challenging, got a call from a friend who asked
if he’d seen a Christie ad that had just aired during the Devils game,
alleging that Tamm and his fellow board members were under
investigation. Alarmed, Tamm called the county prosecutor, who reassured
him it wasn’t true. It was the final weekend before the Republican
primary, leaving no time to respond, and Christie finished first,
tossing Tamm and another Republican off the board. They sued him
successfully for defamation, but years later, Tamm is still dumbfounded.
“Politicians get hammered all the time, but there’s got to be an
element of truth to it,” he told me.
Only four weeks
after taking office, Christie announced that he was thinking of
challenging a veteran Republican for the state Assembly. His ambition
rankled local Republicans. “A lot of people were like, who does this guy
think he is?” says Rick Shaftan, the campaign manager for another
candidate.
(So determined was Shaftan to beat Christie that, at one
point, he went to a local crawfish festival and recruited some
overweight drunk guys for an ad that depicted Christie wrestling
opponents in a mud pit.) Christie lost that race. Two years later, local
Republicans recruited challengers to knock him off the freeholder
board, too. On election night, after Christie gave his concession
speech, one of his nemeses smacked his lips in his direction and
explained, “That’s just me kissing your fucking career goodbye.”
Christie
had now spent tens of thousands of his family’s money and lost two
races in a row. Not long after the election debacle, he had lunch with
his Assembly running mate, Rick Merkt. “It was a couple of gut punches,”
Merkt says of the defeats. But he saw a path forward for his friend. He
suggested to Christie that “the federal route might give him another
bite at the apple.” What Merkt meant was that, instead of running for
election, Christie should try to get himself appointed to an influential
post. In New Jersey, that meant engaging in precisely the sort of
grubby glad-handing Christie had condemned. Still, he was in his late
thirties and all he had to show for his foray into public life was a
middling legal career and a lot of local Republicans who hated him. And
so he took Merkt’s advice.
The
“federal route” turned out to be quite straightforward. First,
Christie sought the counsel of Bill Palatucci, a colleague at his firm.
Years earlier, Palatucci had served as George W. Bush’s driver when he
campaigned for his dad in New Jersey, and he advised Christie to raise
money for Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign. Christie and Palatucci
proceeded to pull in $350,000, more than enough for Christie to qualify
as a Bush “Pioneer”; he and Mary Pat also personally contributed $29,000
to Bush and other Republicans between 1999 and 2001. After the
election, it came time for Bush to nominate a U.S. attorney for New
Jersey, one of the biggest offices in the country. Palatucci pitched
Christie to Karl Rove. It was a competitive field, and Christie had zero
experience in criminal law; indeed, he had never so much as filed a
motion in federal court. He got the nod.
Only after the
September 11 attacks did his qualifications come under any heavy
scrutiny. Suddenly, it didn’t seem like a terrific idea to appoint an
untested, undistinguished lawyer to the district across the river from
Ground Zero. The New Jersey Federal Bar Association, the Newark Star-Ledger,
and the state’s junior senator, Jon Corzine, all criticized the choice.
But the power to clear the nomination for a vote belonged to the
state’s senior senator, Robert Torricelli. The two men met in
Torricelli’s office, and the senator told Christie that, in light of the
terrorist attacks, Bush was entitled to get the post filled fast. (It
was no secret that he also liked the idea of a prosecutor with
Italian-American roots, to counter ethnic stereotypes.) Torricelli told
me that he imposed only one condition: Christie had to hire a
“professional” as his deputy—that is, someone who knew his way around
federal court. A few weeks later, Christie and Torricelli saw each other
at a Christmas party, hours after the Senate had approved Christie’s
nomination. Christie made a beeline for Torricelli to thank him and the
two embraced.
Associated Press
Christie has boasted that Joe DiVincenzo (center) has been with him "right from day one."
Torricelli
may have had other reasons to want Christie in the job. At the time,
the rakish Democrat was under investigation for illegal fund-raising
during the 1996 campaign. When it came time for Christie to select his
“professional,” his first pick was a former federal prosecutor and close
Torricelli confidante. Then it emerged that Christie’s choice had not
been candid about a visit he paid to Torricelli’s home while it was
under FBI surveillance, and Christie had to find someone else.
Soon
afterward, Christie reshuffled the top staff in Newark. One of the
apparent losers was Michael Guadagno, the head of the frauds division
who had led the initial investigation into Torricelli. Christie sent
Guadagno down to the satellite office in Trenton, a demotion that some
in top legal and political circles linked to Guadagno’s work on the
Torricelli case. “Christie exiled him to Trenton,” says one New Jersey
legal veteran. (The case against Torricelli was dropped after he decided
not to run for reelection. He told me he had “no knowledge” of
Guadagno’s involvement and praised Christie’s performance as prosecutor:
“Chris kept the commitment that he made to me.”)
It
wasn’t the cleanest beginning. But Christie had a plan for quashing any
doubts about how he got the job: He would unleash the full might of his
office against corruption. Fighting public fraud, he announced, would be
his office’s top priority after terrorism. “Corrupt politicians will
steal your trust, your taxes, and your hope,” he told a New Jersey crowd
in 2007. The problem was not, he noted, “an insufficient number of
targets.”
Soon after Christie took office, Essex
County’s Republican executive, Jim Treffinger, was out walking his dog
when seven police cruisers surrounded him. Treffinger knew he was under
investigation for awarding no-show jobs to friends and extorting
campaign donations in exchange for contracts. He had repeatedly offered
to surrender to authorities when the time came. Instead, his wife and
daughter watched from the house as he was thrown up against a car and
frisked, an image that appeared in the next day’s Star-Ledger, which had been tipped off to the arrest.
At
first, Christie said the arrest had been left to the marshals. But
later, he cast Treffinger’s treatment in moral terms. Corrupt officials,
he said, shouldn’t be coddled—they were “worse than the street criminal
because the street criminal never pretends to be anything but what he
or she is.” (Local lawyers wondered whether the public shaming might be
linked to Treffinger’s observation, caught on a wiretap, that Christie
was a “fat fuck” who “wouldn’t know a law book from a cookbook.”) “The
perception was that the U.S. attorney was sending a message,” one lawyer
told me.
The next seven years unfolded like a
never-ending perp walk, as Christie racked up more than 130 convictions
and guilty pleas for elected and appointed officials. He had a knack for
extracting the maximum p.r. from every arrest or indictment. “The
office leaked like a sieve,” one Democratic operative recalls. “I had
reporters calling me at four in morning and saying, [so and so] is going
to get pinched.”
Democrats howled that Christie was on
a partisan witch-hunt, since he targeted so many more Ds than Rs. But
it was hard to take such accusations very seriously. After all, New
Jersey’s power structure was dominated by Democrats, and Christie was
uncovering undeniable cases of abuse. One state senator pleaded guilty
for accepting a low-show job at a medical school in exchange for state
grants, another to accepting a $25,000 “success fee” for helping a
mining company obtain permit approvals. Longtime Newark Mayor Sharpe
James got 27 months on charges stemming from the sale of steeply
discounted city properties to an ex-girlfriend. (James’s successor, Cory
Booker, is the first mayor of Newark not to be indicted since 1962.)
Besides,
to accuse Christie of protecting Republicans over Democrats was missing
the point. True, his office had knocked out a swath of New Jersey’s
biggest Democratic power brokers and weakened their organizations in
crucial parts of the state. But that meant the bosses left standing had
only grown stronger.
In
2002, an insurance firm in Mt. Laurel received an unexpected e-mail
from a man named George Norcross. Congratulations, Norcross told the
firm: It had won a big contract for the Delaware River Port Authority,
which oversees four bridges in the Philadelphia area. The e-mail was
unexpected because the firm hadn’t bid for the job. But there was no
need for thanks. The company was simply expected to send Norcross’s
insurance company $410,000 over the next few years, as a “finder’s fee.”
This
is how things work in the world of George Norcross III. Officially, he
is the supremely wealthy chairman of Conner Strong & Buckelew, one
of the largest insurance firms in the nation; the chairman of Cooper
University Hospital in Camden; and, as of last year, the majority owner
of The Philadelphia Inquirer. Unofficially, he is the most
powerful man in New Jersey never to have held elected office.
Close
observers of state politics have estimated that more than 50 elected
officials in South Jersey owe their positions to Norcross (including his
brother, a state senator). Much of the money he raises for candidates
comes from people and companies eager to secure government work or
development deals, as documented over the years by his local paper, the Courier-Post,
among others. Norcross’s own firm holds sway over New Jersey’s large
municipal insurance market. (He declined to comment for this article.)
“George is probably the smartest politician we have now in the state of
New Jersey,” says former Republican State Senator John Bennett. “He
knows where the power is and goes to the power. Whether that power is a
Republican or Democrat.”
One reason that Norcross is so
good at working the machine is that he was born into it. His father,
George Norcross Jr.—“Big George”—was a much-loved union chieftain, and
he would bring “Young George” along to meetings around the state with
governors, state legislators, and CEOs. Young George would go on to drop
out of college—Rutgers wasn’t teaching him anything about politics he
didn’t already know—and start selling insurance out of a basement
office. In 1989, after Big George was snubbed for a spot on the New
Jersey Racing Commission, Norcross entered politics, motivated by a
specific grudge against the legislator who’d stiffed his father and a
more generalized resentment over the slighting of South Jersey. Thanks
to Big George’s lessons and his own hyper-confidence, it wasn’t long
before he gained control of Camden’s Democratic organization and set his
sights on the rest of South Jersey. Today, Norcross is silver-haired
and impeccably dressed and runs his operation out of well-appointed
boardrooms. He is only foul-mouthed in private.
One
Jersey Democrat described to me the first time he experienced the
Norcross treatment. Not long after this politician announced his
candidacy, he was summoned to a meeting with the man himself. Norcross
was all magnanimity. “He said, ‘You don’t need to do anything. I’ll
raise all the money. You just go out there and meet people,’ ” the
candidate recalled.
There was no need for Norcross to
spell out the rest of the arrangement: The fate of those who cross him
is well known. When Bennett dared to oppose state financing for the
arena of a minor-league hockey team Norcross co-owned, Norcross got in a
shoving match with him at the State House. In the following months, a
stream of critical stories about Bennett appeared in a paper edited by a
Norcross friend, contributing to Bennett’s 2003 reelection loss. “He
does everything in his power to go after you,” Bennett told me, almost
admiringly. “He said, ‘I’m going to get you,’ and then he gets you.”
On
numerous occasions, Norcross’s operation has come under legal
scrutiny—from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), state
investigators, and the FBI. The cases are labyrinthine, but they all
involve some dubious overlap of his many public and private interests.
One case in particular threatened to get real traction. In the early
2000s, several New Jersey attorneys general investigated whether he had
pressured a Palmyra councilman to fire a city solicitor, Ted Rosenberg,
who wasn’t cooperating with the machine. Wiretaps offered a rare glimpse
of a man completely convinced of his power. “[Rosenberg] is history and
he is done, and anything I can do to crush his ass, I wanna do cause I
think he’s just a, just an evil fuck,” Norcross said. In another
conversation, referring to then-top Jersey Democrats, he declared, “I’m
not going to tell you this to insult you, but in the end, the
McGreeveys, the Corzines, they’re all going to be with me. Not because
they like me, but because they have no choice.” While discussing plans
to remove a rival, he exclaimed: “Make him a fucking judge, and get rid
of him!”
In February 2003, Norcross met Christie for a
steak dinner at Panico’s in New Brunswick. It was, to put it mildly,
highly unorthodox for a U.S. attorney to sit down with a political boss
who was the subject of state and SEC attention. But Christie brushed off
the criticisms. “I’m very careful with who I would go out with,” he
said. “If I’m looking at somebody, I’d try to stay away from them.”
That,
to the skeptics, was just the issue. His corruption squad was
scrutinizing dozens of lower-profile figures, all the way down to an
Asbury Park councilman charged for getting his driveway paved for free.
Why wasn’t he looking at Norcross? And didn’t he realize that
he might have to in future? Sure enough, the following year the state
attorney general referred the Palmyra case to Christie’s office.
Two
years later, Christie issued a scathing six-page letter announcing that
he would not bring any charges against Norcross. It was a remarkable
document. Not only did Christie openly declare a controversial figure to
be home free, but he accused the state prosecutors of bungling the case
so badly that they may have been shielding Norcross. “The allegation of
some bad motive on the part of the state prosecutors is very unusual,”
says Andrew Lourie, a former chief of the Public Integrity Section of
the Department of Justice.
High-ranking legal sources
in the state view the letter as the ultimate Machiavellian maneuver.
They agree that there may not have been a strong case to bring against
Norcross in the Palmyra case after so much time had lapsed. But by
publicly accusing his state counterparts of protecting Norcross,
Christie was inoculating himself against accusations of favoritism. One
of the former attorneys general who’d handled the case, John Farmer, who
went on to become senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission and is now dean
of Rutgers Law School, told me: “The statements and insinuations
contained in that letter were, as I said at the time, utter nonsense.
The passage of time has only magnified their essential absurdity.”
Norcross
may have been the most formidable player to escape Christie’s net, but
he wasn’t the only one. Another was Brian Stack, a state legislator and
Union City mayor who exemplifies a Jersey tradition Christie had long
railed against: holding paid elected office at both the state and local
levels.
Stack maintains his constituents’ loyalty with acts of largesse
such as doling out 15,000 free turkeys at Thanksgiving. He is rewarded
with Soviet-style vote totals. (His slate won 92 percent in 2010.) In
2007, Christie conducted a massive investigation into legislative
earmarks. It found that Stack had secured $200,000 in state grants that
benefited a day-care center run by his then-wife. Charges were brought
against other legislators for directing money to entities in which they
held a personal interest, but not Stack.
There was
also Joe DiVincenzo Jr., lumbering and gregarious, the protégé of
legendary Newark community leader Steve Adubato Sr. In 2002, “Joe D.”
ran to replace Treffinger as executive of Essex County, the largest
source of Democratic votes in the state. Rumors raged that he, too, was
under investigation, for conflicts between his freeholder duties and his
job (one of four he held at the time) at a produce company with a
county contract. Then, right in the heat of the primary, Christie
released a statement denying that Joe D. was under investigation. “It
was totally unprecedented. I’ve never seen that done by a sitting U.S.
attorney,” said DiVincenzo’s opponent, now-Assemblyman Tom Giblin.
“Trying to get a letter out of the U.S. attorney’s office is usually
like pulling a wisdom tooth.” After Joe D. took office, he invited
Christie to give county workers a symposium on ethics.
Finally,
there was Glenn Paulsen of Burlington County, who had become the most
powerful Republican power broker in the state in part because of his
symbiotic détente with Norcross.
Norcross got a lot of business for his
insurance firm in Burlington County, while Paulsen’s law firm got plenty
of municipal work in Norcross territory. In 2006, Christie’s office
secured a guilty plea from a Republican operative, Robert Stears, for
hugely overbilling several million dollars of lobbying work for the
Burlington County Bridge Commission. According to one person with
knowledge of the matter, it seemed likely that more revelations would
follow and that an investigation of the commission’s spending could draw
in Paulsen, and perhaps even Norcross.
Stears, according to Christie’s
announcement, was cooperating with an “ongoing criminal investigation.”
In court, he explained that he had been “sucked into a corrupt group of
people” and that he had been directed how much to bill the commission
and how much to donate to the county Republican Party, which had been
led by Paulsen. “Everyone was waiting for the second shoe to drop,”
David Von Savage, the former GOP chairman in Cape May County, told me.
It never did. “Chris essentially dumped that investigation—he absolutely
dumped it,” says one lawyer, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of
retribution. “As a favor to these guys, he tanked the investigation
completely.”
By taking down some of the state’s bosses
while leaving others off-limits, Christie had effectively turned the
supposedly apolitical role of prosecutor into that of kingmaker. It was a
brilliant strategy. New Jersey offered such a target-rich environment
that Christie was able to get credit for taking down a slew of crooked
officials and build alliances with some of the most powerful
bosses in the state at the same time. Christie’s allies insist that he
wasn’t playing favorites. “I can’t imagine Christie would suggest in any
way, ‘I want you to lay off of this guy or go after this guy.’ It’s
inconceivable to me,” says Ed Stier, a former federal and state
prosecutor. Still, by the end of his tenure, Christie began showing up
to administer the swearing-in ceremonies of town officials who were
replacing the ones he’d pursued. No one could recall a prosecutor doing
so, says one longtime Jersey hand: “It was like he was giving them his
blessing.”
In
2004, Todd Christie started showing up at state GOP functions—at one,
he distributed boxes of “Christie’s Popcorn” in a not-so-subtle attempt
to build his brother’s brand. By now, Chris’s name was regularly
surfacing as a potential gubernatorial candidate, although protocol
prevented him from openly campaigning.
Given this restriction, Todd
proved to be a useful surrogate. A Wall Street trader, he had made $60
million when his firm was sold to Goldman Sachs. Not long before
Christie’s nomination as U.S. attorney, he gave tens of thousands of
dollars to county Republican organizations; not long afterward, he gave
$225,000 to a subset of the Republican National Committee.
Todd’s
generosity won him entrée to exclusive events at the 2004 GOP
convention—an ideal venue to talk up his brother. “You want to do
everything you can to stay active at a time when he can’t,” he told a
reporter. “I’m not shy in saying I’m one of the people who chirps in his
ear that I think he would make a great governor.”
Even
though Chris was prevented from overtly running for anything, there
were ways he could use his position to quietly lay the groundwork. In
2007, Christie announced a $311 million settlement of a probe into
kickbacks given by five manufacturers of knee and hip replacements.
Rather than pressing charges, Christie opted for deferred prosecution
agreements, under which the companies would pay a fine and accept
outside monitors. This approach saved courtroom costs, but it also
handed Christie the keys to what amounted to a lucrative patronage
system.
In an unusual step for a prosecutor, he flew
around the country meeting with the companies’ boards. The handful of
people he selected as monitors all had one qualification in common: a
personal connection with Chris Christie.
John Ashcroft, Bush’s first
attorney general and Christie’s former boss, got a contract worth as
much as $52 million for 18 months of work. Another went to David Samson,
a former Republican state attorney general and founder of one of the
state’s most connected law firms. Yet another, for $10 million, went to
Christie’s mentor, Herbert Stern, and his friend John Inglesino. Even
Christie’s alma mater, Seton Hall Law School, got in on the act:
Bristol-Myers Squibb endowed a $5 million professorship as part of its
agreement.
There was one monitoring contract that was
especially eye-catching. Here’s the backstory: In 2005, the SEC issued
civil charges against 20 Wall Street floor traders, alleging that they
had illegally traded for their firms’ accounts ahead of those of their
customers. Todd Christie was among the 20.
The U.S. attorney for the
Southern District of New York, David Kelley, followed up with criminal
charges: 15 traders were marched across a plaza in downtown Manhattan in
cuffs. But five of the people named in the SEC action were spared the
public humiliation and the threat of a criminal conviction. Todd was one
of them.
Todd’s absence from the criminal indictment
puzzles lawyers on the case to this day. Unlike some of the traders who
had been charged, he had handled his trades personally rather than
relying on an assistant. And under the formula that authorities used to
quantify the suspect trades, he ranked quite high—people both above and
below him on the list were charged. “It had us scratching our heads,”
said Julian Solotorovsky, who represented one of the accused traders.
Over
time, the criminal cases crumbled. On the civil side, however, the
traders agreed to a range of SEC settlements. Todd’s company paid a
fine, and he acknowledged that he had engaged in “inappropriate
trading.” Other lawyers from the case dismissed the notion that Todd
Christie had gotten special treatment, saying there were plausible legal
explanations for why he’d been spared a criminal charge. “David
Kelley,” attorney Henry Putzel told me, “is as straight as they come.”
Two
years after Kelley moved to private practice in late 2005, Chris
Christie decided to award him one of the monitoring contracts. “What
happened with [Todd] Christie was very fishy,” one of the skeptical
lawyers told me. “When they skipped over him, I was stunned. And then I
heard the other stuff [about the contract for Kelley], and I was like,
Holy shit, it’s so blatant. In my opinion, [Todd] definitely got a pass
because of his brother. I can’t think of any other reason.” Kelley
rejected this suggestion, telling me: “If anybody tries to draw the
inference that there was anything untoward in my appointment, they’re
being silly and irresponsible and unknowing of the facts.”
House
Democrats in Washington would eventually call a hearing on Christie’s
use of deferred-prosecution agreements, and Christie was asked whether
there was a “perception of a quid pro quo” when Kelley was awarded a
contract after having let Todd off the hook. “No, sir, because my
brother committed no wrongdoing and was found not to have committed any
wrongdoing, both by the Southern District of New York and the SEC,” he
answered. The answer begged for a follow-up. The SEC had found wrongdoing, and it was precisely the Southern District’s finding of no wrongdoing in his instance that was at issue1.
But the lawmakers didn’t get a chance to press the matter, because
moments later, Christie abruptly announced that he had to catch a train
and walked out. “It was a strange hearing,” Tennessee Representative
Steve Cohen told me. “He just got up and left.”
Associated Press
Todd Christie (right) is one of his brother's most deep-pocketed boosters.
In
late 2008, Christie announced his campaign for governor. His image as
an enemy of cronyism served him well against Jon Corzine, who was widely
derided as a creature of Wall Street. And behind the scenes, his years
as U.S. attorney paid off in other ways. Brian Stack was conspicuously
slow to endorse Corzine, while Norcross did not hide his lack of
enthusiasm for the incumbent.
Christie later recounted a telling
encounter on the night of his first debate with Corzine, five weeks
before he would win the race by four points. After the event, Christie
was approached by Democratic State Senator Steve Sweeney, Norcross’s
childhood friend who had become a linchpin of his machine. Sweeney told
Christie: “I look forward to working with you.”
New
Jersey’s governorship is the most powerful in the nation. It is the
only statewide elected office, since the governor nominates attorneys
general and treasurers. The governor also determines the size of the
budget, fills hundreds of well-paying slots on the state’s many
commissions and authorities, and doles out aid to its hundreds of towns
and cities. No governor in modern memory has worked these levers as
skillfully as Christie.
First, Christie filled top
posts in his administration with loyalists from the U.S. attorney’s
office. The most controversial hire was Michele Brown, a longtime close
aide who had accompanied Christie on business trips as a prosecutor.
During the campaign, it was revealed that Christie had given her a
$46,000 loan and failed to disclose it on his tax returns. Christie
named her his appointments secretary, a $140,000 post, and put her in
the office directly outside his own, a spot typically reserved for the
chief counsel. The proximity got tongues wagging, and in 2012, Christie
installed Brown as director of the Economic Development Authority, a
$225,000 post in an office a block away.
(Christie joked that he had
been forced to rely on former colleagues because so few people answered
his ad: “Wanted: People willing to work for a moody, passive-aggressive,
demanding, outspoken, unreasonable, fat bully—to make miracles happen
in Trenton.”)
Next, Christie hit the road to sell his
ambitious plan to clean up the state’s finances—slashing wasteful
spending, cutting unsustainable benefits for public employees, and
reining in absurdly high property taxes. In the process, he perfected a
political persona that was somehow enormously appealing in spite of
itself. Christie could be charming when he felt like it: Sometimes, he
would pace the stage, stand-up comedian-style, dispensing observational
humor about public pensions. More often, though, he was just plain
aggressive.
At one meeting, as one teacher rose to earnestly question
his agenda, Christie sloughed off his suit jacket as if it were a
boxer’s robe. “If what you want to do is put on a show and giggle every
time I talk, then I have no interest in answering your question,” he
said. The crowd swooned; the clip got 1.3 million hits on YouTube. (“I
love the guy!” said a township committeeman afterward.) Insults that
Christie has publicly hurled at his antagonists—reporters, lawmakers,
citizens, little old ladies—include, but are not limited to: “stupid,”
“jerk,” “idiot,” “hack,” “ignoramuses,” “thugs,” “big shot,” “losers,”
and “numb-nuts.”
It’s no easy feat to become a
political hero by yelling at schoolteachers, and yet Christie has
managed it. Just as he carefully cultivated his image as an
anti-corruption crusader while he was U.S. attorney, as governor,
Christie has presented himself as the implacable enemy of fiscal
irresponsibility. Even his weight, so often the subject of disparaging
speculation among national reporters, has worked to his advantage in
these settings. Christie utterly dominates a room—planted center stage,
an immovable force. His willingness to get in the face of his critics,
his refusal to budge—it all gives the impression of a rare politician
who cannot be co-opted or cowed.
And yet right from
the outset, Christie was working as closely with the machine as any
recent governor. Well before his election, the Democratic bosses had met
at the U.S. Open in Queens to divvy up the leadership spoils. Sheila
Oliver, who worked under Joe D. in Essex County, would become the
speaker of the Assembly. Sweeney would get the Senate presidency.
Sweeney was a union man—an ironworker—but he was a Norcross man first
and foremost.* When it came time for the vote on Christie’s proposal to
cut public-employee pensions and health benefits, Sweeney delivered the
numbers. It was a coup for Christie—national pundits hailed him as a
politician more interested in getting results than scoring partisan
points.
In hindsight, what is notable is how openly
Christie embraced the bosses. He sent massive resources in their
direction; when they came under fire, he vouched for them. In early
2011, it emerged that Stack’s wife, now estranged, had been allowed to
use city SUVs for personal use and fill up for free at the city’s
natural gas pumps. Christie defended him: “I have no reason to question
Brian Stack’s integrity.” (Stack returned the compliment, calling
Christie “the greatest governor the state has ever had.”) On paper,
Union City embodies the kind of waste that Christie has vowed to
eliminate—it paid its police chief a handsome $248,000 in 2011 and
provides health benefits to part-time elected officials. And yet it has
been showered with cash from Trenton—about $12 million per year in
discretionary “transitional aid.”
Christie’s bond with
DiVincenzo was just as overt. Corzine’s attorney general had led an
investigation into voter fraud by election workers in Essex County,
after reams of absentee ballots were filled out to benefit Joe
D.-approved candidates. Following Christie’s election, the case was
quickly wrapped up with a handful of light sentences for low-level
workers. During his term, Essex County has been deluged with millions
for big capital projects. The relationship has thrived despite 2012
revelations by The Star-Ledger that Joe D., who makes $153,000
per year on top of a $68,000 pension for the same job (via a legal
loophole), has claimed an astonishing list of reimbursements from his
campaign funds for personal expenses, such as a trip to Puerto Rico and
more than 100 meals over the course of three months. In 2011, Christie
observed that Joe D. had been with him “right from day one.”
As
for George Norcross, he is more powerful than ever. “It’s not just
South Jersey anymore. Now it’s way beyond that,” says the longtime
Jersey hand. Christie consented to Norcross’s pick to lead the patronage
goldmine that is the Delaware River Port Authority.* The following
year, the authority gave a $6 million grant to a cancer center at
Norcross’s Cooper University Hospital. Next, Christie pushed through a
controversial measure that granted Norcross his desired merger between
Rutgers-Camden and nearby Rowan University.2
The result was a well-funded university that will further expand the
Norcross empire—boosting beleaguered Camden, yes, but also putting even
more jobs, money, and development projects at his disposal. (A former
Navy SEAL attending Rutgers-Camden challenged the merger at a town-hall
meeting. As he was escorted out by police, Christie hollered after him:
“After you graduate from law school, you conduct yourself like that in a
courtroom, your rear end is going to be thrown in jail, idiot!”)
Christie’s
administration had set out to change the way Trenton did business. But
its behavior has turned out to be all too familiar. Those with close
ties to the governor have thrived. According to one senior lawyer, it
was made clear to supplicants that their prospects would improve if they
hired the lobbying firms that employed Samson (now the Port Authority
chairman) and Palatucci (the Bush connection). A Louisiana company that
wanted to win the $68 million contract for overseeing Sandy relief funds
brought on Glenn Paulsen, the GOP power broker from Burlington County.
Last May, Paulsen’s law firm made a $25,000 donation to the Republican
Governors Association, which Christie leads, and soon afterward the
Louisiana company got the Sandy job. Torricelli, too, has flourished as a
lobbyist in the Christie era.
Any hard feelings
Michael Guadagno might have had about his 2002 move to Trenton would
seem to have been allayed: Christie named Guadagno’s wife to be his
running mate in 2009 and he himself was elevated to an appellate
judgeship three years later.* But there was no lenience for those who
bucked the system. Take Democratic State Senator and former Acting
Governor Richard Codey, a Norcross nemesis. First, Christie slashed
funding for an anti-postpartum-depression program founded by Codey’s
wife. Then, Codey’s former chief of staff lost his state job and Codey’s
cousin was fired from his high-paying post at the Port Authority. A
personnel report on the cousin’s sexual harassment of another man, years
earlier, was leaked to the press. Legislators told me of seeing GOP
colleagues who had threatened to defy Christie on key votes leaving his
office in tears or drenched with sweat.
In early 2013,
as Christie’s reelection neared, the operation kicked into overdrive.
Christie was fixated on securing Democratic endorsements to bolster his
image as a Republican with crossover appeal. It didn’t matter that he
was expected to waltz back into office—people needed to get on the list.
The administration’s intergovernmental-affairs staff, who knew which
mayor or county official had gotten which grant, was moved almost
wholesale to the campaign. Christie himself made repeated calls to mere
county-level officers: clerks, sheriffs, registers of deeds.
For
those who got behind the governor, there were incentives. To give but
one example: The close-knit Orthodox community in Lakewood had endorsed
Corzine in 2009. In March, a coalition of the town’s rabbis and
businessmen announced it would be backing Christie this time around. Two
months later, the state granted $10.6 million in building funds to an
Orthodox rabbinical school in Lakewood, one of the largest expenditures
for any private college in the state. (The yeshiva was not exactly
cash-strapped: A copy of its application I obtained noted that its
endowment “far exceeded” the $1.84 million it was expected to contribute
to the project.)
As Election Day neared, you could be
forgiven for mistaking Christie for a Democrat. State Republicans were
frozen out; candidates were told not to include his name or picture on
their literature. “We didn’t get the support,” says George Wagoner, a
losing Assembly candidate. Meanwhile, the weight of the Democratic
machine swung behind the Republican governor. More than 50 Democratic
elected officials endorsed Christie, including Brian Stack (who was hit
with a $68,725 fine in July for failing to properly disclose campaign
spending) and Joe D. (who also has a large fine looming). In photos and
media appearances, Christie kept showing up smiling alongside Sweeney
and other prominent Democrats. Norcross didn’t formally endorse
Christie, but he made his approval clear. At one event, Norcross said
he’d recently seen a man in a “Chris Christie: too big to fail” t-shirt.
He told Christie: “You’re not too big to fail—you’re too good and too
important to fail us.”
Meanwhile, Barbara Buono, the
state senator who had volunteered to challenge Christie when more
prominent Democrats, such as Cory Booker, declined, was unable to raise
anywhere near enough money for a credible campaign. Numerous Democratic
donors refused to give above the $300 threshold where their names would
be disclosed, fearing Christie’s retribution. “I’d say to people, ‘What
is going on?’ ” Buono recalls. “This is an election, not a military
junta.” She attended one campaign rally in a North Jersey church, at
which Sheila Oliver, once a reliable ally of the bosses, railed against
unnamed powerful people who were supporting Christie only because he had
a “dossier” on them. A month before the election, a picture surfaced on
Twitter of Christie and Norcross, arm in arm at a Cowboys-Eagles game
in Philadelphia. “I didn’t think [Norcross] would embrace me,” says
Buono. “But I didn’t think he’d work directly against me.” In the end,
Christie won by 22 points and Republicans gained not a single seat in
the state Senate.
And
now we come to the national uproar over the mother of all traffic jams
in Fort Lee. Christie has denied any knowledge of the ruse. But it has
become increasingly hard to credit his ignorance, given how deeply
involved he had been in his team’s political outreach to local
officials, not to mention that the names of many of his closest aides
were surfacing in communications about the closures. Among national
Republicans, even some of Christie’s most vocal backers have started to
waver. One Republican strategist told me: “No one’s rushing out there to
defend him, because they don’t know where this could go next.”
The
Democratic bosses, though, are standing by their man. Norcross declared
that, instead of obsessing over the bridge, national Democrats should
be “pretty concerned about circumstances involving the implementation of
Obamacare right now.” Joe D. struck a blasé tone: “Every place I go,
people say, ‘What do I care? Why are we talking about it?’ ” And Brian
Stack blasted the claim that Christie had threatened to withhold Sandy
aid from Hoboken as “far-fetched.” “My relationship with the governor
and his staff and this administration has been one of the best,” Stack
said—as if that wasn’t part of the problem.
What
Bridgegate has laid bare is the skill and audacity with which Christie
constructed his public image. “It’s almost like people were in a
trance,” Buono told me. Christie may have been misunderstood for so long
because his transactionalism diverted from the standard New Jersey
model. He wasn’t out to line his own pockets, or build a business
empire. He wasn’t even seeking to advance a partisan agenda. And yet it
was transactionalism all the same. Christie used a corrupt system to
expand his own power and burnish his own image, and he did it so
artfully that he nearly came within striking distance of the White
House. When he got cozy with Democratic bosses, people only saw a man
willing to work across the aisle. When he bullied his opponents, they
only saw a truth-teller. It was one of the most effective optical
illusions in American politics—until it wasn’t.
Alec MacGillis is a senior editor at The New Republic.
*Correction:
This article initially misstated Steve Sweeney's former trade. The
title of the Delaware River Port Authority official whom Gov. Christie
consented to keeping on, John Mattheussen, was CEO, not chairman. And
Michael Guadagno's promotion to an appellate judgeship was made by the
state's chief judge, a gubernatorial appointee.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)