By Brad Friedman
While we have, for more than a decade, covered the extreme
vulnerabilities of voting machines and electronic tabulators and broken
numerous exclusive stories about it on both The BRAD BLOG and The BradCast,
my guest on today's show offers a number of additional ways - some of
which had largely never even occurred - by which bad actors could
disrupt U.S. elections.
Michael Gregg, IT security expert and COO of the private, Houston-based computer security firm, Superior Solutions wrote about some of those concerns recently at Huffington Post.
He joins me today to discuss several of the ways that U.S. democracy
could be disrupted by political hacktivists, election insiders or even
foreign entities and how we might not ever even know about it if they
did - thanks to the type of electronic voting systems we now use in
all 50 states and the different ways in which the public is now being
blocked from overseeing our own elections and election results.
"Attackers could potentially get in and do these things and it would
be very hard to prove. The scary part is, by the time any of this is
worked out, the election is over with, so it's too late," he tells me. I
ask him how elected officials in his home state of Texas - much of
which forces voters to use 100% unverifiable electronic voting systems
- react when he points out these concerns. "We've brought that up
multiple times, but that seems to be the powers that be, how they want
to do things."
Gregg, who I've never spoken to previously, concludes, as I have,
that paper ballots (hand-marked and hand-counted, in my case) are the
most secure way to run elections. "I agree with you 100%," he says. "If
you have a paper-based system, it's very very hard to attack, it's very
much easier to be able to detect those types of things."
As to Internet Voting, well, you'll want to tune in for this computer
security professional's opinion on whether or not the Internet can ever be secure enough to use for the most important aspect of our representative democracy.
Also today: New York Times digs deeper still on their inaccurate Hillary Clinton reporting (as we covered in great detail on yesterday's show);
Incurious global warming trolls fall, once again, for the old "Earth is
cooling" scam; The racist Charleston, SC church shooter pleads "not
guilty"; And Shell Oil evades activists to try and begin drilling in the
Arctic...
Download MP3
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spammers, stay out. Only political and video game discussion here.