So, Morning Mika's Husband took some of his own "executive time" to pen a
Washington Post op-ed claiming that Michael Bennet, Colorado's
"soft-spoken, white son of the establishment" could be the answer to the
Democratic party's prayers.
Leave it to proud ex-Republican to try to sell us on a conservative
white, straight, middle-aged corporatist as the "savior" of the party he
loves to preach to but would never join. Michael Bennet gave one good
speech (and I'll give it to him--it was a good speech) on the senate
floor, and all of a sudden he's supposed to eclipse the likes of Kamala
Harris and Sherrod Brown as the one senator who can beat the Idiot
Cheetoh because he's...what...so much like him?
Michael Bennet, just like Trump, knows what it's like to have
everything handed to him. He only won his senate seat because he got to
run as an incumbent, having been appointed by then-Governor Bill Ritter
to fill a vacancy. And Ritter only plucked Bennet from the
Superintendent of Denver Public Schools job (a position he was appointed
to despite having ZERO school administration experience) because he
(Ritter) had some personal grudge against the wildly popular Andrew
Romanoff, former Speaker of the Colorado House of Representatives. And
despite Romanoff having clobbered Bennet at the state convention, Bennet
ended up winning the primary because President Obama, in a move for
which I will never forgive him, endorsed Bennet. (Why on earth Obama
put his thumb on the scales in a Democratic Primary, I will NEVER
understand.)
As Colorado's senator, Michael Bennet has distinguished himself
by...well...not distinguishing himself. Until his famous "Ted Cruz is a
big meanie" speech, very few people could have named the state he
represents. He serves on three rather quiet committees, and his votes
tend to be non-controversial, as are the bills he sponsors. In short,
he just doesn't seem to want to make news. Now, that might be
Scarborough's idea of presidential material, but I personally want a
leader who...leads.
I truly don't intend to knock Bennet. As our senator he has been
fine. Just fine. (Personally I'm hoping Andrew Romanoff, who just
announced a run for Cory Gardner's seat, will make it to the Senate
after all. Romanoff is my idea of a real Democrat.) I just
think it's kind of rich that Joe fucking Scarborough thinks he knows
what the Democratic party "needs." After all, when Joe served in the
People's House--as a Republican--he sponsored a bill to withdraw
from the United Nations, voted to defund the Corporation for Public
Broadcasting, and worked to try to impeach Bill Clinton. And I won't
even go into his own little intern scandal. Google it.
Joe seems to think that since Bennet isn't a lefty-liberal, that he
can "save" the Democratic party. Well, I think that the 2018 elections
proved that the party, and indeed the country, is ready for some loud, proud lefty-ness. And frankly, if we want to beat Cheetoh, the last
person we should nominate is a milk-toast, "soft-spoken" centrist. If
Joe thinks that's what this country needs, let him convince his own former party to nominate Michael Bennet.
1. Fuck you if you're watching the videos
of students from Covington Catholic School hooting and yelling and
chanting and dancing in their douchewear of MAGA hats and Trump shirts
and you think,
"Oh, this is totally innocent and not racist." And double fuck you in
your mouth and your ass if you look at images and videos of very white
Nick Sandmann standing and smirking in front of very Native American
Nathan Phillips and believe, as Sandmann's parents' hired guns
wrote for Sandmann, "I said a silent prayer that the situation would
not get out of hand." Bullshit. Anyone who has ever been around a group
of young white dipshit males has seen that fuckin' smirk, that face that
says, "You wouldn't touch me because I'm white and I got a group of
angry white boys around me who are pissed off that they missed the era
of lynching." Jesus, it must have been frightening to be surrounded by
those howling piss ants in their MAGA gang colors.
1a. The one thing I'll give the forensic videologists of the right is
that I never clearly heard the racist dipshit kids chant, "Build the
wall." They may have. They may not have. I'm just saying I didn't hear
it. Update: I watched another video,
the one where the kid (whose name is probably Squee) rips his shirt
off, and they are definitely chanting, "Donald Trump" for a couple of
moments.
1b. Don't fuckin' tell me to "Watch the video of the whole thing."
Motherfuckers, I did watch it. And it shows exactly what it looks like: a
bunch of privileged white Christian boys getting off first on
confronting some black people (the Hebrew Israelites are fuckin'
assholes) and then on confronting some Injuns. They likely thought
they'd finally get a hug from their MAGA fathers for doing it. Hell,
they were probably gonna circle jerk about how brave they were for
months after. Probably still will. While a Trump speech is playing on
their phones.
1c. Teenagers know that everything...every fucking thing...will be
recorded. They love it. They want it. They want to see how the stupid
shit they do gets major likes and hearts and whatever the fuck. That's
also what Sandmann was thinking standing there, knowing that his boys
were recording. "Holy shit, this is gonna be so sick on my Insta." The
old person argument of "I could do stupid things when I was a teenager
and no one would ever see it" is bullshit because today's kids expect to
be recorded. They do the stupid shit because they want it recorded.
2. As a liberal, I think the way that teenagers of color are treated by
our American justice system, our American culture, and our American
politicians is fucking disgusting. It is a savage fucking country that
arrests kids and tries them in court as adults
and talks about them like they are grown ups and not bundles of
hormones whose brains haven't fully developed. It's a savage fucking
country that lets kids live in abject poverty and does almost nothing to
help them get out and then punishes them when they step even a little
out of line, like acting up in school. All of this need to change, be reformed, overturned, anything. We have failed our kids miserably in so many ways.
2a. If you're conservative and you're pissed off at all the people on
the left who are condemning the Covington Catholic dipshits, saying that
they're just kids and are making stupid kid mistakes, I wonder how
you'd've reacted if it had been a group of African American teen boys
who just came from a Black Lives Matter march and were smirking at and
mocking a white minister singing, "Amazing Grace"? Fuck you. You know
what you would've said. You'd've been calling for them to be castrated
and sent to the fields. Yet now you act like the public outrage at the
dipshits makes them the moral equivalent of unarmed black teens shot by
the police.
2b. The right also viciously attacked the Parkland teens for daring to
speak out about gun control. When they planned a national school walkout
for students, conservatives lost their goddamned minds. "They're being manipulated
by adults," they said. "They're just being exploited." Yet somehow when
you arrange for groups of Catholic school kids to go march against
abortion rights, that's not exploitative. Weird, huh?
2c. If you're liberal and you want the racist dipshits treated like
non-white kids are treated in America, well, sorry, but that's just
fuckin' hypocritical. I don't want the racist dipshits gunned down by
cops or sent to prison for absurdly long sentences or anything like
that. I don't want that to happen to any teenagers. I do want the entire
goddamn country to get back to the idea that all kids are kids, and,
except in exceedingly rare cases, they should be treated as such. That's
not a way to excuse the racist dipshits from Kentucky. But it is to say
that our reaction to all teen dipshittery, criminal or not, should be
contextualized by the fact that they are still kids. (And if you think
sending death threats to the school or the kids is right, you can go
fuck yourself.)
2d. To get super-harsh here, when teens are gunned down in a school or
are the victims of some other crime, we are quick to label them as
"children." Well, why do teen victims get to be innocent children while
teen criminals get to be adults?
2e. Yeah, the dipshits deserve to be punished by their school and, if a
crime was committed, charged with it. Of course. That's obvious. But
punish them as kids, as we should all kids.
3. The dipshits have shitty parents, shitty teachers, and shitty
religious leaders. They all have failed. The chaperones on the trip
failed. The adults failed. They should be punished. They should be fired
if they are at the school. Too bad we can't fire parents. The adults
close to these kids are gonna fuck it all up. They already are.
4. Nathan Phillips has actually been incredibly insightful about the whole situation. In an interview with the Cincinnati Enquirer,
he said, "I'm disappointed with [Sandmann's] statement. He didn't
accept any responsibility. That lack of responsibility, I don't accept
it." All he wants is for the dipshits to accept that they were dipshits.
That's where learning begins. "I'm just working for a better future for
all of our children," he said. "But, I can't work with liars and
thieves." And, in one of those so-wise-it's-almost-a-stereotype moments,
he added, "I live in the plains and I've watched a tornado come down.
It's very destructive. What I saw in front of me that day was
destruction from a terrible storm tearing apart the fabric of my America
and threatening the future of all our children." He now wants to meet
with the dipshits and try to teach them what they did was wrong, in case
they don't understand that simple fact. Maybe he can tell them what the
Indigenous Peoples March was for, too.
4a. Yeah, he's not a Vietnam War vet, although he did serve in the Marines. Well done, right-wing media. So? Does that mean Phillips deserves the treatment he received? Assholes.
Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz has made headlines all week after he
announced his interest in running for President, but the American
public isn’t too happy about it.
In fact, most people are sick and tired
of billionaires like Schultz who want to take away our privileges and
safety nets while hoarding billions of dollars in cash for themselves,
but that is EXACTLY what Schultz’s platform is shaping up to be. Ring of
Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.
During an interview with CBN, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee
Sanders said that God actually chose Trump to be resident and that the
Almighty WANTED Trump to be resident of the United States.
This woman
isn’t playing with a full deck, and her comments prove that. But there’s
a lot of implications from her comment that she likely didn’t realize,
and Farron Cousins explains those.
Rallying at the first Women's March with my aunt, a cardboard Hillary Clinton, and my posterAs I made plans to
participate in my third Women’s March in January, there had been one big
change in my life this time around: I was no longer living with my
husband.
Last fall, after 24 years of marriage and almost two years of
dealing with the aftermath of the devastating 2016 election, I decided I
could not live with this person anymore. Why?
Because, while the
results of the election were devastating for me, they were not for my
husband. He voted for Donald Trump, and he has continued to support him.
So as a staunch liberal and a frequent Trump protester, I had to do
something.
Over a couple of months, I began to look for a full-time job to
support myself. I toured apartment complexes in our area, I ordered new
furniture on my credit card, and I began the process of moving my life
to a new place—without him. I moved out of our house of 20 years during
the last weekend in October and into an apartment. And I have not
regretted it.
* * *
Eric (a pseudonym) and I met in the early 1990's, when we were
both in our late 20's. We didn’t talk much about politics, but I
volunteered for Greenpeace and Amnesty International and was just
beginning to identify as a liberal. From what I gathered, he was pretty
apolitical and middle-of-the-road in his views. We seemed to get along
great.
We enjoyed going to parties with mutual friends, listening to
live music at local clubs, going on hikes in the area, traveling, and
laughing together. Looking back at it, that’s probably all we had in
common. At the time, it seemed like a lot.
We got married in May 1994, adopted a dog, and had our first
child in October 1996. He was followed by another son, and then a
daughter. I guess our compatibility started to fray a little after we
started a family. We had differences of opinion about raising our kids,
but who doesn’t? He came from a more traditional, Catholic family who
expected me to quit my full-time newspaper job when I had my first baby.
That bugged me. I did resign, but that was because I had a
tiny premature baby at home and couldn’t bear to leave him in day care
and be gone all day working. So I started a freelance editing business
and worked from home, which I continued to do over the years while I
raised three kids.
Along the way, I realized that Eric and I were canceling each
other out at the voting booth. He voted Republican or, later,
Libertarian, and I never voted for anyone but Democrats. We joked about
it, but it wasn’t a major deal.
Until it was.
Our differences—and the strain they caused—began to pile up
over the years. I am the daughter of a women’s libber who was an
activist in the 1960's and 70's, and I was influenced by her. Eric seemed
to disparage feminism. He made several sexist comments to me during our
marriage, such as the fact that he thought he
should be the head of our household. He once told me that he didn’t need
me as a friend, because he had enough friends. It felt like he was
relegating me to a more sexual, subservient role.
Our problems as a couple gradually increased. I became a gun
safety activist, and toted my oldest son with me when I went to the
Million Mom March on Mother’s Day 2000.
Other marches followed, and
eventually I joined Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense, after the massacre
at Sandy Hook. Being a parent definitely brought that whole issue to
the forefront for me. But as a father, Eric never felt strongly about
the kids being killed in schools in our country. I had passionate views
about this topic, and he just laughed at me and my emotions. He didn’t
argue about gun safety with me, but my activism seemed to be a joke to
him.
Exactly when Eric started to move more to the right of center,
I’m not certain. But as I suffered through the George Bush years, it
definitely bugged me that Eric voted for him in both elections. Around
this time, he also started to get more religious and explore new
churches. I was not a churchgoer, and we didn’t get married in a church.
But I started to suspect that he was sliding over to the religious
right. I had participated in an abortion rights march before we got
married, and now here Eric was reciting pro-life (and anti-choice)
propaganda.
Then Barack Obama came along. I volunteered for his campaign,
and was overjoyed when he won. My middle child was geared up to
volunteer too, at just age 9. He went with me to the first Obama
inauguration, and I was so happy that he wanted to be there. We bundled
up in layers of winter gear that cold January morning and took a VRE
train in from Virginia to Union Station. Walking out of the station onto
the streets spilling over with such energy and excitement, I was
thrilled to be part of this historic moment, and to be sharing it with
my son. We both donned Obama knit hats that I bought from a street
vendor.
But later, I went home to the person I had taken my marriage
vows with. Of course Eric didn’t like Obama. He grumbled about him and
his policies, and he continued to complain about him for the next eight
years. It was another reminder to me that we just were not simpatico.
I brought up the idea of marriage counseling, but we never went forward
with it. I found it was easier just not to talk politics with him.
But all of that pales in comparison to what was to come next:
Donald Trump. I truly think the 2016 presidential campaign and election
heralded the beginning of the end of our marriage.
When I heard that Trump was running, I really didn’t think
anybody would actually support him, especially in my circles. I said
jokingly to Eric, “You better not vote for Trump in the primary,” never
considering that he actually might. His synopsis of Donald Trump was
simple: “He cracks me up.” I tried talking to him about all my
objections: the racism, the misogyny, the blatant egoism, the
corruption, the idiocy, the mocking of the disabled! But he didn’t care.
He thought that Trump’s actions and words were funny and didn’t believe
what the media were reporting. He hated Hillary Clinton and what she
stood for. And to add insult to injury, he told my daughter he didn’t
like Hillary because “she doesn’t wear dresses or skirts.” When I heard
that, I was fuming.
And soon I was canvassing for Hillary. I joined Pantsuit
Nation, and I got involved however I could. I was horrified when Trump
picked off all his Republican rivals and eventually became the GOP
choice for president. But like so many of us, I really didn’t think he
would win against Hillary.
And then he did, and my worst nightmare came true. Waking up
the morning after the election to confirmation that Trump was going to
be president was surreal. I was too upset to talk about it with Eric—I
was sure he would gloat about the Trump victory. I felt really distanced
from him the week after the election. He knew I was distraught, but we
had nothing to say to each other.
I had to find comfort with like-minded people; I wasn’t going
to find it in my marriage. So I texted my Democrat friends and invited
them out for drinks at a local restaurant, to commiserate. After hugs
and symbolic safety pins were passed out among us, we made plans to go
to the resistance march in January 2017 that we were just starting to
hear about. A friend offered to charter a van to get us into Washington
for the march. And with our plans taking off that night, my heavy heart
was lightened a bit.
But there was one thing I couldn’t say to my friends as we
discussed going to the Women’s March and protesting the new
administration: “My husband supports Trump.” I could not admit that. I
was too embarrassed and ashamed, so I hid it.
But my mood got better as word spread to family and friends
about our transportation for the march, and that one van ended up
becoming four chartered buses from Vienna, Virginia, to the National
Mall. My mom flew out from Chicago to join us, along with my aunt from
Maine, and my 14 year old daughter planned to go as well.
The night before the march, the four of us carefully took
colorful markers to poster board, creating our heartfelt protest
posters—even while Eric was spouting off ridiculous pro-Trumpisms to my
mom and aunt. I tried to shush him, and I’m sure my annoyance was
palpable. But he just didn’t seem to get it, and I felt myself
disconnecting a little more from him with each moment.
Before the election, I had asked Eric not to show his support
for Trump in front of my family or friends. At one point, I almost
stormed away from the table when we were out to dinner with a couple in
Annapolis who also were staunch Democrats, because he was defending
Trump. I asked him to stop or I would have to walk away. He just didn’t
seem to get the scope of my deep disdain for Trump, and my utter
annoyance with him for supporting the man.
The day of the first Women’s March was amazing, such a
momentous time to be out there with thousands of other protesters in
pink hats. I was proud to be part of this moment with my mom and my
daughter, and gratified about the numbers of people from all over the
country and world taking part in this and the sister marches. But the
fact that my husband was home disagreeing with what we were so
passionately doing on the streets of the nation’s capital just gnawed
away at me.
I had no idea that day that the Women’s March would be the
first of many such protests of the Trump administration that I would
come to take part in. There was so much to object to, I just couldn’t
stay home, especially living as close to Washington as I do. I was an
occasional activist before Trump became president. After that day,
resistance became my life’s norm. I continued to march, to go to rallies
and protests, as every week there was something else to be alarmed
about. All the while, Eric made light of my activism, embarrassed me in
front of people with his comments, and usually managed to express the
opposite of what I believed in.
So I started to seriously think about getting out. I realized the truth: Eric was not my soulmate, and he probably never was.
After a too-long beach vacation with my relatives in August
2018, I was feeling more resigned about ending our marriage. We didn’t
get along well during that trip, and I was always worried that Eric
would open up his mouth and spout out words supporting Trump, or that
sounded vaguely homophobic, or that expressed his inane belief that
climate change was a myth. And I noticed he had become so rigid about
everything, like an old man I didn’t know. How did I end up here with
this person? I couldn’t even look at him anymore, and the long car ride
home seemed endless.
I came back home determined to find my way out. I knew he would
never leave our house, and if I wanted to separate, I would have to be
the one to move out. I wasn’t working full-time then, but I started to
apply for jobs and also went to secretly tour apartment complexes in our
area. It wasn’t the first time I had explored the idea of moving out,
but this time I felt more sure and actually went to see possible new
homes. I told no one of my plans.
Eric could tell that I was troubled about our relationship and
that I was distant with him.
He tried, however halfheartedly, to make it
better. I went back and forth on what to do. I felt if I was going to
do this, I had to leave soon. But how was I going to explain to anybody
that after 24 years of marriage, it would be our difference in politics
that would end up tearing us apart?
I delayed my decision for a little while and tried to see the
positive side of staying with him and the life we had built together.
But then came the last straw.
Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court. I
couldn’t bear this and knew I had to go resist, again. I found out about
a big protest being planned. The night before, I brought it up to Eric,
hoping that he would finally agree that this all was a travesty, but
no—he angrily stated that Kavanaugh was innocent and the “Democrats have
waged a smear campaign on a great federal judge.” I lost it. I couldn’t
believe that he was defending a sexual predator like Kavanaugh,
especially when we have a teenage daughter.
The next day, I called the apartment complex next to my
daughter’s school and told them I wanted to sign a lease. I was prepared
to call it quits. I knew I couldn’t live with a Trump supporter
anymore. I told Eric I was getting a full-time job and moving to an
apartment. I felt terrible, but it was hard for me to talk about it with
him without getting very emotional, so I kept it brief. However, I knew
it was the right thing to do.
Soon I moved out of the house we shared for 20 years, and it
was a relief. Eric and I later talked about the reasons why I left. He
replied that he didn’t think politics was something to split up over,
that it didn’t matter that much to him. I said that it does to me. And that was the heart of the issue, right there: It matters a lot to me.
* * *
Now that I’m in the new apartment, although it is much smaller
than the house we shared and I don’t see my kids quite as much, I have
felt my anger, annoyance, and shame dissipate. And that’s better for
everybody. I am happier now that I no longer share a bed and a life with
someone whose beliefs are so contrary to mine.
So as I recently prepared to march again in Washington, I
reflected on how this was my first political protest since moving out of
the house and marriage. This time I was in a much different place, both
figuratively and literally, as I headed out to the third Women’s March.
When I stepped into the streets with my sign and started chanting, I
knew that I could live with myself a little bit better. Because now when
I continue the resistance, I’m no longer going home to the opposition.
And that feels great.
Jennifer Merrill is a freelance writer, former newspaper copy
editor, and current editor at a science education trade association. She is the author ofChasing the Gender Dreamon Amazon. You can follow her on Twitter @Hey_Jen_Merrill.
This government shutdown is weighing on all of us. I'm sick of it, I'm
sick of cable networks streaming Trump being a jerk, I'm sick of all
the lies, and I'm heartbroken by all the horrible stories of what's
happening to the people who work for the government.
I am not alone, apparently. Senator Michael Bennet went off on Ted
Cruz, the shutdown, and his frustrations with the shutdown. Hard.
“I seldom rise on this floor to contradict somebody on the
other side,” Bennet began. “I have worked very hard over the years to
work in a bipartisan way with the presiding officer with my Republican
colleagues, but these crocodile tears that the senator from Texas is
crying for first responders are too hard for me to take.”
“When the senator from Texas shut this government down in 2013, my
state was flooded. It was under water. People were killed. People's
houses were destroyed. Their small businesses were ruined forever. And
because of the senator from Texas, this government was shut down for
politics,” Bennet shouted, voice rising. He was referring to the 2013 Colorado floods, which devastated the state and killed 8 people.
He was just warming up. Watch the abridged version above, or the full version below.
The Internet lit up on Monday evening as photos of Donald Trump’s buffet
for the Clemson Tigers’ celebratory dinner made the rounds on social
media.
Trump greeted the National Champions with food from McDonald’s,
Wendy’s, and Burger King, with some pizza for good measure.
The dipping
sauce packets were placed in beautiful silver bowls, and golden candles
lined the table of this hillbilly buffet. Ring of Fire’s Farron Cousins
discusses this.
Resident Trump has gone to extraordinary lengths to
conceal details of his conversations with Russian President Vladimir
Putin, including on at least one occasion taking possession of the notes
of his own interpreter and instructing the linguist not to discuss what
had transpired with other administration officials, current and former
U.S. officials said.
Trump did so after a
meeting with Putin in 2017 in Hamburg that was also attended by
then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. U.S. officials learned of Trump’s
actions when a White House adviser and a senior State Department
official sought information from the interpreter beyond a readout shared
by Tillerson.
The constraints that Trump
imposed are part of a broader pattern by the president of shielding his
communications with Putin from public scrutiny and preventing even
high-ranking officials in his own administration from fully knowing what
he has told one of the United States’ main adversaries.
Jesse talks about the latest reporting from the New York Times and the
Washington Post which reveals that not only has Donald Trump gone to
great lengths to keep secret (even from the United States Intelligence
community) the content of his private conversations with Vladimir Putin,
but that in the aftermath of the firing of James Comey, the FBI opened a
counter intelligence probe into Donald Trump to determine whether or
not he was a witting/unwitting Russian intel asset.
It certainly sounds like an urban legend — an episode of a 1950's
western TV series featured a snake oil salesman named Trump who claimed
that only he could save a community from destruction by building a wall.
But the debunking site Snopes says the show, part of the "Trackdown" series starring Oakland native Robert Culp, did in fact air on CBS in 1958.
A clip from the episode was uploaded to YouTube, captioned "Predicted Donald Trump," in November 2016.
The "End of the World" show features actor Lawrence Dobkin as Walter
Trump, a con man who predicts a firestorm would rain down on the Texas
town of Talpa unless he intervenes to save it. Culp, playing Texas
Ranger Hoby Gilman, calls Trump's bluff and eventually arrests him for
"stealing."
Trump sold the townspeople force-field umbrellas to deflect meteors.
Interestingly, the character's speech is so
similar to the resident, it almost seems as if Donald Trump
borrowed some catchphrases from Walter Trump. A portion of the dialog
follows:
Narrator: Hoby had
checked the town. The people were ready to believe. Like sheep they ran
to the slaughterhouse. And waiting for them was the high priest of
fraud.
Trump: I am the only one. Trust me. I can build a wall around your homes that nothing can penetrate.
Townperson: What do we do? How can we save ourselves?
Trump: You ask how do you build that wall. You ask, and I'm here to tell you.
During the presidential campaign, Donald
Trump declared, "Politicians have used you and stolen your votes. They
have given you nothing. I will give you everything. I will give you what
you've been looking for for 50 years. I'm the only one."
On June 16, 2015, Trump said, "I would build a
great wall, and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me, and
I'll build them very inexpensively,"
WASHINGTON — In the days after resident Trump fired James B. Comey
as F.B.I. director, law enforcement officials became so concerned by
the resident’s behavior that they began investigating whether he had
been working on behalf of Russia against American interests, according
to former law enforcement officials and others familiar with the
investigation.
The inquiry carried
explosive implications. Counterintelligence investigators had to
consider whether the resident’s own actions constituted a possible
threat to national security. Agents also sought to determine whether Mr.
Trump was knowingly working for Russia or had unwittingly fallen under
Moscow’s influence.
The investigation the F.B.I. opened into Mr. Trump also had a criminal aspect, which has long been publicly known: whether his firing of Mr. Comey constituted obstruction of justice.
Agents
and senior F.B.I. officials had grown suspicious of Mr. Trump’s ties to
Russia during the 2016 campaign but held off on opening an
investigation into him, the people said, in part because they were
uncertain how to proceed with an inquiry of such sensitivity and
magnitude. But the resident’s activities before and after Mr. Comey’s
firing in May 2017, particularly twoinstances
in which Mr. Trump tied the Comey dismissal to the Russia
investigation, helped prompt the counterintelligence aspect of the
inquiry, the people said.
The incoming Democratic Congress looks like it's going to use its
majority to stand up for the American people and hold Donald Trump
accountable, starting with requesting his tax returns (as allowed by
U.S. Code › Title 26 › Subtitle F › Chapter 61 › Subchapter B › § 6103)
from the Secretary of the Treasury.
