By Cody Fenwick
/ AlterNet
Former White House ethics lawyer and Democratic Senate candidate Richard Painter argued
on CBS Monday night that there is much more evidence against resident
Donald Trump for obstruction of justice than there ever was against
President Richard Nixon before he resigned in disgrace.
The difference between the two situations? Congress, Painter said.
"We have far more evidence of abuse of power and obstruction of justice than we had in 1973 when I was 12 years old and the House and the Senate convened the Judiciary Committees to have hearings with respect to Watergate and President Nixon. We're well-beyond that point. And yet the House and the Senate won't do anything at all.
The difference between the two situations? Congress, Painter said.
"We have far more evidence of abuse of power and obstruction of justice than we had in 1973 when I was 12 years old and the House and the Senate convened the Judiciary Committees to have hearings with respect to Watergate and President Nixon. We're well-beyond that point. And yet the House and the Senate won't do anything at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spammers, stay out. Only political and video game discussion here.