A panel discussion on MSNBC’s AM Joy on the violence in the streets
in the city of Charlottesville turned to the root causes of the rise of
white nationalism under Donald Trump.
“This is the face of fascism, this is Breitbart news,” declared former Bush era ethics czar Richard Painter.
As
live video of the clashes showed on the split screen, Painter lashed
out at President Donald Trump and called for him to fire White House
advisers Steve Bannon and Sebastian Gorka.
“I don’t always agree
with everything the Republican administrations do but we have never ever
seen rhetoric similar to what has come out of this White House,” the
clearly disgusted Painter said. “We never had anyone like Steve Bannon
or Sebastian Gorka in the Bush White House, to that president’s
inauguration.”
“That is disgusting. We never would have tolerated
that and we can disagree,” he continued. “I disagree with my own party
on some issues, but we never would have had any of this in the Bush
White House and these people need to be fired immediately. This is
Breitbart News, and Breitbart News is a racist organization and it needs
to acknowledge as such, they should not be given preferential access to
the White House which is what they’re now getting under Steve Bannon.”
“Bannon
needs to be fired, Sebastian Gorka and the rest of the fascists or we
have to remove this president,” he said while indicating the violence.
In this ‘Dollemore Daily’ Jesse Dollemore addresses Donald Trump and his THANKS
and APPRECIATION to Vladimir Putin after having retaliated against
almost 800 U.S. State Department employees working in Russia.
Why Can't Donald Trump Say a Single Bad Thing About Vladimir Putin?
Download audio and video of the full two hour show on-demand + the members-only post game show by becoming a member at http://www.tytnetwork.com/join/. Your membership supports the day to day operations and is vital for our continued success and growth.
Young
Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or insurgent member of an institution,
movement, or political party. 2. A young person who rebels against
authority or societal expectations.(American Heritage Dictionary)
According to a new report, foreign diplomats visiting the United States
are less than impressed with Donald Trump. In fact, they can’t seem to
stop laughing about how pathetic he really is, and about the fact that he
won’t shut up about his predecessor, Barack Obama.
When other countries
are laughing, we should probably reevaluate our choices.
According to a new report, European diplomats do not have a very
flattering image of Donald Trump. In fact, according to these European
diplomats, who interviewed with BuzzFeed on the condition of anonymity,
they actually view Donald Trump as most Europeans do, as a complete
laughingstock. The latest available polls show us that 79% of people
living in Europe do not trust Donald Trump. They do not think he is an
effective leader, and they think he is an embarrassment for the United
States, and as a U.S. citizen, you're absolutely right. We agree with
you on this.
But the fact that these diplomats, who do have the
job of having to meet with Donald Trump, having to work with him when he
goes on these overseas trips, the fact that they see him as a
laughingstock is not anything that people in the United States should be
laughing at. That is a very dangerous situation when nobody among your
ally countries respects your leader, that they do not view him as a very
serious person, and more important as the interview states, they don't
view him as an intelligent person. One of the diplomats said that they
actually play a form of word bingo when the president is around because
he always uses the same words, over and over, like it's great, it's
very, very good, it's tremendous. They say he has such a limited
vocabulary, that is one of the sources of ridicule among the other
diplomats.
Furthermore, and one of the most dangerous about him
they said was that the man is clearly obsessed with President Obama.
During meetings, they said Trump would not want to debate issues. He
would ask if it was something Obama had supported. If the answer was
yes, Obama supported it, Trump would blindly and blankly say, then I do
not support it. No debate, no discussion, no understanding at all of
what they were actually talking about. He just wanted to be opposed to
anything that Barack Obama was for, and that is one of the biggest
problems that they see over in Europe. Donald Trump is too obsessed with
Obama to be an effective leader.
According to these diplomats,
it appears that Donald Trump's only policy goals for the United States
are to undo the accomplishments of Barack Obama. And to be honest, from
what we've seen so far coming out of the Oval Office, that does appear
to be his only agenda. He doesn't care about creating jobs. He doesn't
care about protecting the environment or anything having to do with
anything related to Americans. He just wants to roll back every single
thing President Obama did so that four, eight years down the road, Obama
can't look at this country and say, oh, that was the program I put in
place, because Donald Trump wants to destroy it all.
And he's not
only destroying things over here in the United States, as we see from
this story. He's also destroying our image that Barack Obama had rebuilt
amongst our allies in Europe, and maybe that's Trump's plan, since
everyone in Europe really seemed to like Barack Obama, especially after
eight years of Bush and our image overseas declined tremendously. Barack
Obama repaired that. So I guess Donald Trump destroying that is just
another part of his let's undo all of Obama's accomplishments policy.
Randi Rhodes Number-one ranked progressive radio talk show host,
political commentator, entertainer, and writer. The Randi Rhodes Show
was broadcast nationally on Air America Radio, and Premiere Radio
Networks from 2004–2014. Rhodes represents aggressively independent
media.
The Miami Herald described her as "a chain-smoking bottle
blonde, part Joan Rivers, part shock jock Howard Stern, and part
Saturday Night Live’s ‘Coffee Talk’ Lady. But mostly, she's her rude,
crude, loud, brazen, gleeful self."
Rhodes and her show won numerous
awards for journalism and broadcasting, including Radio Ink’s Most
Influential Woman, Radio Ink’s Most Influential Women’s list (multiple
years), TALKERS magazine’s Woman of the Year, and the Judy Jarvis
Memorial Award for Contributions to the Talk Industry by a Woman.
Tensions are heating up between the U.S. and North Korea, and Donald
Trump appears to only want to escalate the situation. After warning
North Korea that they would be met with “fire and fury” like the world
has never seen, he took to Twitter to brag about the state of our
nuclear weaponry. Trump desperately wants to launch a nuclear attack,
and the results will have global ramifications for the U.S. Ring of
Fire’s Farron Cousins discusses this.
GOP strategist Ana Navarro has finally had enough of Donald Trump’s
nonstop lying, and during a recent media appearance she compared the
president to a used car salesperson who just keeps making things up to
make a sale. Trump’s lies are certainly growing out of control, but he
doesn’t appear to be pulling back any time soon. Ring of Fire’s Farron
Cousins discusses this.
He knows you are but what are he?
Gather ’round the campfire, everyone, for Glenn Greenwald has a Very Serious Question:
Oh golly. That’s a hard one. Let’s get out our abacus and some scratch paper and weigh the pros and cons.
Greenwald, who likes to remind his readers every now and then
(constantly) that he really really really really really doesn’t like
America, and who is in theory a liberal who embraces liberal values, but totally isn’t,
is just not sure whether Donald Trump’s plans to rip healthcare away
from millions, deport the fuck out of every brown-skinned person he
sees, and so on, are worse than the generals — Mattis, McMaster and
Kelly — SUBVERTING TRUMP’S AGENDA by sneakily getting appointed to
sweet-ass cabinet and White House positions by Donald Trump, and then
sort of trying to rein in some of President Fuck-Bonkers’s most
dangerous tendencies.
Oh and he’s mad about the Deep State, because of course he is.
Greenwald spends a lot of his column beating a straw man to death,
claiming that all the sane people who HAAAAAATE Trump, many of them
conservatives who worked tirelessly to keep him from getting elected,
and who have been in “COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY, MOTHERFUCKERS” mode since
Greenwald’s pals at WikiLeaks and the Russians he is SO IN LOVE WITH (he would deny that accusation,
but ya know, actions speak louder than words, and also fuck him) helped
Trump get elected, think Greenwald and his weirdo friends are dumb for
believing there is a “Deep State.” This is a false construct. We very
much know there is a Deep State, and we know it makes Greenwald and Sean
Hannity shit the bed, so we make fun of them about it.
But he’s really really confused about which is worse: that Trump is
in office and beating the shit out of American institutions and the
Constitution, or that the so-called Deep State (normal people refer to
them as “career public servants”) is trying its damnedest to protect the
Republic from Trump’s damage. The horrors! It reminds us of that thing Anthony Scaramucci whined
during his 120-some-odd-hour tenure as White House Communications
Director, about how there are some White House staffers who “think it is
their job to save America from this president.” It’s almost as if there
is a wide consensus among thinking Americans that the traditions we
hold dear are in danger, and that we should do something about it.
(Also, to all those people, thank you!)
But Greenwald can’t abide that, because how DARE the Deep State
Military-CIA-Industrial Complex act all high and mighty like they for
real care about protecting America from the authoritarian dipshit in the
White House, when it’s very clear that #BothSidesDoIt anyway? How could
Donald Trump possibly be more evil than the United States Of America
has always been since forever?
No matter how much of a threat one regards Trump as being,
there really are other major threats to U.S. democracy and important
political values. It’s hard, for instance, to imagine any group that has
done more harm, and ushered in more evil, than the Bush-era neocons
with whom Democrats are now openly aligning. And who has brought
more death, and suffering, and tyranny to the world over the last six
decades than the U.S. national security state?
Is it really hard to imagine any group that’s hurt people more than
the Bush era neocons? What kind of pathetic What-About-Ism is this,
GLENN? Is it not possible to simultaneously believe that the neocons
empowered by George W. Bush did a lot of really bad shit (and that
America in general has some blood on its hands), AND ALSO that Russia
under Putin, the Rwandan genocide, North Korea, hell, a bunch of Communist governments going way the fuck back, are WORSE? What about ISIS?
It’s handy that he only goes back six decades, otherwise he’d have to
contend with little things like Hitler and Stalin and oh God what the
fuck kind of #SlatePitch would we be reading then?
Don’t get us wrong — we don’t think it’s ideal that generals
are in all these positions, or that #DeepState patriots are doing what
they’re doing, and during ANY other presidency, we’d probably be
appalled. But to use Greenwald’s construction, what president has done
more to abuse power and subvert American institutions in his first six
months of office than Donald Trump?
Anyway, this is very stupid, and what we’ve come to expect from Greenwald, who also is PRETTY SURE
the Trump-Russia story is a buncha lies. As soon as he finds the time,
we’re sure his Intercept website will publish a journalism exclusive
claiming to have found the 400 pound New Jersey dude Trump always claims
REALLY hacked the 2016 election, and we will have to tell him to go
fuck himself all over again.
Donald Trump and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster.
Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
Donald
Trump has scrambled the political spectrum in certain ways, and one of
them has been to introduce a new set of players to the national scene.
“Nationalists” or “populists” (as they now call themselves), or the
“alt-right” (as they used to call themselves), have been vying with
traditional Republicans for control of the Trump administration. The
nationalists tend to be pro-Russia, virulently anti-immigrant,
race-centric, and conspiratorial in their thinking.
Their current
project is a political war against National Security Adviser H.R.
McMaster, a conventional Republican who displaced the nationalist
Michael Flynn. The nationalist war against McMaster has included waves
of Russian social-media bots, leaks placed in the nationalist organ Breitbart, and undisguised anti-Semitism.
Most
observers outside the nationalist wing have treated McMaster as the
sympathetic party in the conflict. The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald is a
notable exception. Greenwald has depicted the conflict, much like the
nationalists themselves have, as the machinations of the deep state to
prevent the authentic, democratically legitimate populist
representatives of Trumpism from exerting their rightful authority.
Greenwald himself is not a nationalist, and is certainly not a bigot,
but the episode has revealed a left-winger’s idiosyncratic sympathy for
the most odious characters on the right.
Greenwald lays out his thinking in a deeply, if inadvertently, revealing column denouncing anti-Trump saboteurs in the deep state.
The
foundation of Greenwald’s worldview — on this issue and nearly
everything else — is that the United States and its national-security
apparatus is the greatest force for evil in the world. “Who has brought
more death, and suffering, and tyranny to the world over the last six
decades,” he writes, “than the U.S. National Security State?” (This
six-decade period of time includes Mao’s regime in China, which killed
45 to 75 million people, as well as the Khmer Rouge and several decades
of the Soviet Union.)
In Greenwald’s mind, the ultimate expression of
American evil is and always will be neoconservatism. “It’s hard, for
instance, to imagine any group that has done more harm, and ushered in
more evil, than the Bush-era neocons with whom Democrats are now openly
aligning,” he argues.
The
neoconservatives have lined up against Trump, and many Democrats agree
with them on certain issues. Since the neocons represent maximal evil in
the world, any opponent of theirs must be, in Greenwald’s calculus, the
lesser evil. His construction that “it’s hard … to imagine” any worse
faction than the neocons is especially telling. However dangerous or
rancid figures like Steve Bannon or Michael Flynn may be, the
possibility that they could match the evil of the neocons is literally
beyond the capacity of his brain to imagine.
A
second source of Greenwald’s sympathy for the nationalists is their
populism. The nationalists style themselves as outsiders beset by
powerful, self-interested networks of hidden foes. And while their
racism is not his cup of tea, Greenwald shares the same broad view of
his enemies.
Trump
“advocated a slew of policies that attacked the most sacred prongs of
long-standing bipartisan Washington consensus,” argues Greenwald. “As a
result, he was (and continues to be) viewed as uniquely repellent by the
neoliberal and neoconservative guardians of that consensus, along with
their sprawling network of agencies, think tanks, financial policy
organs, and media outlets used to implement their agenda (CIA, NSA, the
Brookings/AEI think tank axis, Wall Street, Silicon Valley, etc.).”
It
is certainly true that all manner of elites disdain Trump. What’s
striking is Greenwald’s uncharitable reading of their motives, which
closely tracks Trump’s own portrayal of the situation.
Many elites
consider Trump too ignorant, lazy, impulsive, and bigoted for the job.
Instead Greenwald presents their opposition as reflecting a fear that
Trump threatens their wealth and power. (This despite the pro-elite tilt
of his tax and regulatory policies — which, in particular, make it
astonishing that Greenwald would take at face value Trump’s claim to
threaten the interests of “Wall Street” and its “financial policy
organs.”)
The
opposition to Trump naturally shares a wide array of motives, as would
any wide-ranging coalition. Greenwald’s column consistently attributes
to those opponents only the most repellant beliefs. He doesn’t even
consider the possibility that some people genuinely believe McMaster is a
safe, responsible figure who might help dissuade the president from
doing something terrible.
Greenwald emphasizes, “Hank Paulson, former Goldman Sachs CEO and George W. Bush’s Treasury Secretary, went to the pages of the Washington Post
in mid-2016 to shower Clinton with praise and Trump with unbridled
scorn, saying what he hated most about Trump was his refusal to consider
cuts in entitlement spending (in contrast, presumably, to the Democrat
he was endorsing).” It is true that Trump promised not to cut
entitlement spending. Greenwald’s notion that this promise placed him
“presumably in contrast” with Hillary Clinton ignores that fact that
Clinton alsopromised to protect these programs.
The
passage about entitlements appears deep in Paulson’s op-ed, which
Paulson began by lambasting Trump for encouraging “ignorance, prejudice,
fear and isolationism,” among other flaws. Greenwald asserts that
Paulson identifies Trump’s hostility to cutting entitlements as “what he
hated most” about the Republican nominee, but nothing in the op-ed
indicates this is what Paulson hated most.
Greenwald just made that part
up.
The
same concoction of motives is at work in Greenwald’s contempt for
McMaster and John Kelly, the new chief of staff. The pair of former
generals “have long been hailed by anti-Trump factions as the Serious,
Responsible Adults in the Trump administration, primarily because they
support militaristic policies — such as the war in Afghanistan and
intervention in Syria — that are far more in line with official
Washington’s bipartisan posture,” he writes.
Note
that “primarily.” Greenwald is arguing that news coverage treating them
as competent managers, as opposed to the amateurish nationalists, is
propaganda by the elite plumping for greater war in Afghanistan and
Syria. He is implying that if Kelly and McMaster took more dovish
positions on Afghanistan and Syria, their public image would be
altogether different. Greenwald supplies no evidence for this premise.
In fact, McMaster’s most acute policy struggle has been his efforts to maintain the Iran nuclear agreement, one which has placed him on the dovish side, against an established neoconservative position. Greenwald does not mention this issue, which fatally undermines his entire analysis.
The
final point of overlap between Greenwald and the nationalists is their
relatively sympathetic view of Russia. The nationalists admire Putin as a
champion of white Christian culture against Islam, a predisposition
Greenwald does not share at all. Greenwald has, however, defended Russia’s menacing of its neighbors, and repeatedly questioned its ties to WikiLeaks.
From
the outset, he has reflexively discounted evidence of Russian
intervention in the election.
“Democrats completely resurrect that Cold
War McCarthyite kind of rhetoric not only to accuse Paul Manafort, who
does have direct financial ties to certainly the pro — the former
pro-Russian leader of the Ukraine,” he asserted last year. (Manafort did have financial ties to that leader, a fact that was obvious at the time and which Manafort no longer denies.) Democratic accusations that Trump had hidden ties with Russia were a “smear tactic,” “unhinged,” “wild, elaborate conspiracy theories,” a “desperate” excuse for their election defeat, and so on.
As
evidence of Russian intervention piled up, Greenwald’s line of defense
has continued to retreat. When emails revealed a campaign meeting by
Russians on the explicit promise of helping Trump’s campaign, Greenwald brushed it off
as politics as usual: “I, personally, although it’s dirty, think all of
these events are sort of the way politics works. Of course if you’re in
an important campaign and someone offers you incriminating information
about your opponent, you’re going to want it no matter where it comes
from.”
This
closely tracks the Trump legal team’s own defense of the Russia
scandal, a fact that is probably coincidental. (There are only so many
arguments to make.) Greenwald is not a racist, and is the opposite
of a nationalist, and yet his worldview has brought him into close
alignment with that of the alt-right. A Greenwaldian paranoid would see
this quasi-alliance as a conspiracy. The reality of his warped defenses
of Trump is merely that of a monomaniac unable to relinquish his
obsessions.
This is what happens when your biggest fans are bots.
Like pretty much everything else about his presidency, Donald Trump’s
Twitter following is a lie. His social media fan base is mostly made of
fake accounts; his legion of followers overwhelmingly comprised of automated bots.
This weekend, Trump inadvertently reminded us how phony his social
media popularity is when he shined a light on what he erroneously
believed was an adoring supporter. That Trump booster turned out be a
Twitter bot—just one of the millions of fake accounts that exist solely
to bolster the popularity of the most unpopular
president in American history.
On the heels of the president basically
catfishing himself, Twitter has since suspended the fake account and a
slew of others just like it.
Airbnb has deleted accounts and
canceled bookings of users who appear to be connected to "Unite the
Right," a far-right political rally set for Saturday in Charlottesville,
Virginia.
Neo-Nazi and white
supremacist website The Daily Stormer had organized a series of large
rally-weekend gatherings through the home-sharing site, Airbnb told NBC News.
Concerned Airbnb users flagged the thread, leading the company to
investigate potential violations of its user contract, which calls for
unbiased hospitality.
Airbnb said
they decided to remove the far-right lodgers because they were "pursuing
behavior on the platform that would be antithetical to the Airbnb
Community Commitment."
Jason
Kessler, organizer of the "Unite the Right" rally and self-described
"pro-white" activist, said Airbnb's blocking of certain users is
"outrageous and should be grounds for a lawsuit."
Clay
Hansen, the executive director of the nonpartisan Thomas Jefferson
Center for the Protection of Free Expression in Charlottesville,
said Airbnb's choice to terminate accounts does not violate the First
Amendment.
"I would say that
while Airbnb's actions wouldn't necessarily comport with general free
speech principles, they are a private company and are entitled to enact
and enforce their terms of service as they see fit," Hansen told NBC
News.
The rally, scheduled to take
place Saturday in Charlottesville, is shaping up to be the "the largest
hate-gathering of its kind in decades," according to the Southern Poverty Law Center.
As
of Tuesday, Aug. 8, almost 700 people said they would be attending, and
another 1,200 showed interest in the event on its Facebook link. The
rally aims to "to affirm the right of Southerners and white people to
organize for their interests."
"It's
the racial targeting of white people for their ethnic advocacy,"
Kessler wrote in an email to NBC. "Would Airbnb cancel the service of
black nationalists or Black Lives Matter activists for their social
media activity? Of course not!"
White
supremacists gathered in Charlottesville in May to protest the removal
of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee's statue. They chanted "All White
Lives Matter" while carrying torches. Klu Klux Klan members also
protested there in July for the same cause.
The statue has not yet been taken down, but Charlottesville has gained the reputation for hosting white nationalism rallies.
Thanks to the advancement of white nationalism to the White House, the racist “alt-right” is having quite the heyday. BuzzFeed News reports,
however, that many prominent figures from the movement have been
getting shut out of numerous platforms for using them to make money off
of spreading hate.
Prominent members of the so-calledalt-rightand other right-wing movements often rely on crowdfunding platforms and online payment processors tofund their causes(and sometimes even theirbail),
but lately they’ve been having trouble accessing the money donated by
their supporters. Over the past five months, PayPal has banned or
hobbled the accounts of several prominent people and groups that promote
far-right politics. Crowdfunding platforms like GoFundMe, Patreon, and
YouCaring have also cut fundraisers for alt-right–associated causes and
people.
Considering that the tech world doesn’t exactly have the best track
record with diversity and tolerance, this is a pleasant surprise. It may
also be a hopeful sign that finally we’re seeing folks recognizing that
members of the alt-right support hateful and backward ideologies.
In response to the slow shut-out, Richard Spencer launched a new site
where the racists can raise money—all in the name of their twisted
concept of “free speech”—in peace.
And a new, invite-only crowdfunding site called "Hatreon" that launched in June hasgarnered attention from Richard Spencer,
the white nationalist credited with coining the term "alt-right."
Hatreon told BuzzFeed News that it currently hosts 50 campaigns
supported by about 130 donors who send roughly $3,000 per month in
total. The company said these numbers represent a soft launch and that
its site will be available to the public soon. Cody Wilson, a cofounder,
said he and others started the site after Patreon kicked right-wing
content creatorTV KWAoff its platform at the end of May.
Paypal’s crackdown isn't limited to American alt-right “activists.”
Accounts for a French anti-immigrant group called Generation Identity
and the violent anti-Muslim site Bare Naked Islam have been blocked
and/or limited, too.
LINCOLN, NEBRASKA—Since I am presently located in proximity to god alone knows how many nuclear missiles,
I am forced to take very seriously the latest evidence that Trump has left whatever hinges he ever had
far, far behind.
This is the way Saddam Hussein used to talk, or the way some 12-year old gamer crows after reaching Level 900 of Nuclear Zombies In Heat. To
hear Trump spout off like this has the
potential to have half the world hiding in the basement. For me, I'm
going to walk carefully around here for a couple of days. You can never
tell what might pop out of the ground.
The last couple of days have been banner ones for racists of just about
every stripe, from backwoods yahoo country fucks to ostensibly educated
white nationalist shit crumbs, from pandering politicians to true
believers. Let's just run it down:
1. The Department of Justice
is exploring whether the federal government should be "suing
universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to
discriminate against white applicants." It's as if they believe that
diversity on college campuses is a bad thing, probably because it makes
people more sympathetic to people of other races. And how can you have a
race war if that happens?
2. President Donald Trump announced his support for the RAISE Act,
which is an anodyne acronym masking a shitty policy. It looks to cut in
half the number of legal immigrants coming into the country, and it
emphasizes skilled workers who can speak English. Oh, and only spouses
and children can come over with immigrants.
When nutzoid hate-filled jizz goblin Stephen Miller, a senior policy advisor and winner of "Man Who Most Looks Like a Star TrekAlien" was asked
about the racist implications of the proposal, he went into an outrage
froth that coated the gathered reporters in a glistening film of saliva.
It reached a spittle-flecked climax when Miller attacked CNN's Jim
Acosta for daring to suggest that one purpose of the bill might be to
bring in more white people, saying that "it reveals your cosmopolitan
bias to a shocking degree." Fuck's sake, "cosmopolitan" means you give a
shit about the world. The opposite of "cosmopolitan" is, more or less,
"xenophobic." Or it's just an anti-Semitic dog whistle
(which is extra weird since Miller is Jewish). Either way, between that
and a bizarro attack on the meaning of the Statue of Liberty, it was a
fucking train wreck of an appearance.
3. The Washington Post printed transcripts
of Trump's late January phone calls with Mexican President Enrique Pena
Nieto and Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull. While they are
masterpieces of fuckery, dickishness, and doltishness, it's also worth
pointing out how fucking openly racist Trump is willing to go when
talking about refugees.
When Turnbull presses Trump on honoring a deal on at least vetting
refugees to possibly take them into the United States, Trump goes
twitchy with paranoia. He knocks Cubans: "You remember the Mariel boat
lift, where Castro let everyone out of prison and Jimmy Carter accepted
them with open arms. These were brutal people." Yeah, see only 2% of the
125,000 Cubans who came here in 1980 were deemed criminals who needed
to be deported. The rest fucking made Miami what it is today. (Oddly,
Miller brought up the Mariel boat lift in his remarks yesterday. These
Trumpers are consistent in their assholery.)
Then, after Turnbull insists that the U.S. live up to its obligations,
something Trump is well-known not to give a flying rat fuck about, the
president says of the refugees who have been living in horrific
conditions on islands off Australia, "I hate taking these people. I
guarantee you they are bad. That is why they are in prison right now.
They are not going to be wonderful people who go on to work for the
local milk people...maybe you should let them out of prison." Who knows
where all these milk jobs are, but Trump equates "refugee camp" with
"prison," which would probably shock a lot of the little children who
are there.
This shit is so blatant it'd make a robed KKK member say, "Whoa, a little obvious there, fella."
Look, we know Trump is racist. We knew it for years, from the Central
Park Five to birtherism to the Muslim travel ban. It has been one of his
most consistent traits. And we know that Trump has surrounded himself
with racists, with people who are directly connected to white
nationalist groups. And we know that Trump's supporters are racist
(yeah, you are, fuck off).
And now we're seeing the policy implications of that. Trump used to ask
various non-white groups, "What the hell do you have to lose?" in
electing him.
Randi Rhodes interviews David Cay Johnston, investigative journalist and author,
a specialist in economics and tax issues, and winner of the 2001
Pulitzer Prize for Beat Reporting about his book - The Making of Donald
Trump - Get the book here - every purchase supports the show: http://amzn.to/2cnN0z9
For the full show, get a commercial-free audio podcast at RandiRhodes.com and please subscribe to Randi's YouTube channel!
Randi
Rhodes Number-one ranked progressive radio talk show host, political
commentator, entertainer and writer. The Randi Rhodes Show, was
broadcast nationally on Air America Radio, and Premiere Radio Networks
from 2004–2014. Rhodes, represents aggressively independent media.
The
Miami Herald described her as "a chain-smoking bottle blonde, part Joan
Rivers, part shock jock Howard Stern, and part Saturday Night Live’s
‘Coffee Talk’ Lady. But mostly, she's her rude, crude, loud, brazen,
gleeful self."
Rhodes and her show won numerous awards for journalism
and broadcasting, including Radio Ink’s Most Influential Woman, Radio
Ink’s Most Influential Women’s list (multiple years), TALKERS magazine’s
Woman of the Year, and the Judy Jarvis Memorial Award for Contributions
to the Talk Industry by a Woman.