It seems like a lifetime ago that Republican National Committee chief
Reince Priebus brokered a meeting between the unexpected presidential
nominee Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan to try iron out their
differences. But it was just a little less than a year ago in a world
that seems more and more distant by the minute. They spoke of many
things, with Ryan desperately trying to convince Trump that he needed to
adopt the GOP agenda and Trump telling him he didn’t know what he was
talking about.
Bloomberg reported one particular exchange in the meeting that stuck in my mind:
According to a source in the room, Trump criticized Ryan’s proposed
entitlement cuts as unfair and politically foolish. “From a moral
standpoint, I believe in it,” Trump told Ryan. “But you also have to get
elected. And there’s no way a Republican is going to beat a Democrat
when the Republican is saying, ‘We’re going to cut your Social Security’
and the Democrat is saying, ‘We’re going to keep it and give you
more.’”
Trump may not have realized it, but Republicans have never won the
presidency by explicitly saying they were going to make cuts to Social
Security. They have always used euphemisms, saying they were going to
“privatize it” or promising to “save it” from itself. The reason
Democrats continually win the day (if not the office they are vying for)
is because people don’t trust Republican double-talk on the subject and
for good reason. They have been trying to destroy Social Security since
it was enacted.
Historian Arthur Schlesinger wrote in “The Coming of the New Deal”
that President Franklin Roosevelt knew that creating a dedicated funding
stream gave workers the “legal, moral, and political right to collect
their pensions.” He said, “With those taxes in there, no damn politician
can ever scrap my social security program.” Schlesinger also noted that
Republicans and business leaders at the time were appalled, with one
warning that the program would “undermine our national life by
destroying initiative, discouraging thrift, and stifling individual
responsibility.”
Donald Trump’s comment in that meeting last year that he agreed with
Ryan on a “moral basis” indicated that he was on the same page as those
earlier plutocrats even if he sings a different tune in public. [...]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spammers, stay out. Only political and video game discussion here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spammers, stay out. Only political and video game discussion here.